>>14560585

Thank you, baker!

Video describing the making of the content of the following posts:

https://rumble.com/vmbja1-decode-and-much-more-september-10th-2021-enjoy-.html

Reforms to Protect the Restored Republic

by Juan O'Eight

Foreword

This book is not intended to thoroughly document the ills being suffered by America and

the World to convince skeptics. Those ills have been described in alternative news, and at

the time this is written, it is anticipated that there will be progress toward Disclosure.

Those who believe that America's ills need to be cured by reparations, redistribution,

intense censorship, the favoring of one race or color, rule by an elite class, the

discontinuation of ownership, and the elimination of the enumerated rights in the US

Constitution need to look elsewhere. Those who are still unaware of the intense amount

of corruption, propaganda, misinformation, destruction of rights, infiltration of schools

and universities, human trafficking, destructive cult-religion, bribery, blackmail, treason,

economic manipulation, promotion of hatred of America, weaponized weather, and

efforts to reduce world populations, need to do their own research and practice

discernment in revealing likely truth. In this quest, persons need to avoid trusting

"experts" more than their own eyes and common sense, and unfortunately need to

dedicate a great deal of time to gathering reports and distilling likely Truth.

This book certainly is not designed to be "expert" in any sense other than applying logic

to discerned truth and presenting this logic to the reader. And the purpose of this book is

not to present a mature prescription for curing America's ills. Instead, it is being offered

as a potential starting point for discussion among the populace. That discussion does not

seem at this writing to have begun to any serious degree in alternative news. Instead, it is

by scant rumor that such discussions have occurred behind closed doors, and without any

degree of consensus. Bringing this discussion out into the open is an important step that

needs to occur. The author cares less as to whether the specific reforms outlined in this

work are adopted, but more about whether the objectives those reforms are aligned

toward are achieved. And it is no wonder that behind those closed doors there is a lack of

agreement. As this book will assert and contend, the measures necessary to reform the

system are radical, there is no support for them among the populace, because they are

antithetical to currently ingrained culture. Therefore, behind their closed doors, those

arguing for prescriptive measures strong enough to be effective are opposed by others

who understand that without public support those measures would appear tyrannical, and

would either be thwarted, or the degree of force necessary to implement them would be

anti-thematic. This disagreement represents a classic dilemma so long as thinking goes

on inside a defined box of acceptable and unacceptable solutions. Such disagreement also

demonstrates a lack of awareness of how public opinion and support can be rallied and

molded when faced with a challenge, the classic example being the citizenry of Britain

during World War II. When it is clearly understood that moral courage, privation, and

dedication are necessary to survival, very ordinary citizens become extraordinary sources

of will and perseverance

>>14560601

One of the themes of this book is that there are root causes of the ills suffered by

America, and that if these are not well understood and addressed, there is no amount of

truth, arrests, prosecutions, presentment of confessions, or anything else that will prevent

a return of the same ills, perpetrated by a new generation of bad actors, because the ills

are caused by systemic flaws. Further, the methods by which these ills are addressed need

to be strong enough that the problems never return. A return of the same types of

problems by bad actors would most likely be accompanied by an understanding of how

and why this attack on America failed, and a determination to avoid those mistakes. As it

appears the destruction of the bad actors of the current generation was at many points in

doubt, the return of the same problems, with the final proof against these being a

dedicated military sworn to defend the Constitution, which in this case was itself

corrupted to a degree found insufficient, relying upon this same safety margin is in the

opinion of the author a poor plan. A better plan is to institute reforms that will achieve the

intent of the Constitution by means of checks and balances in the civilian governmental

system. Of course, it is not a certainty that this can be achieved. The author certainly

makes no claim to having the wisdom of the Founding Fathers, and yet the system they

set up was captured and turned against The People. the author simply feels that this a

quest worth taking up, to try to restore the Republic, to make one's best effort in trying to

make the dream of French philosophers of establishing a government that protects natural

and inalienable rights, a dream that arguably was the thing that countless American

patriots died for, a dream that is hallowed by their sacrifice, a dream that in fact provided

the glow and aura of the New World, to try to make this dream live.

Another important idea of this book is, this attack on Society exists in many arenas,

among them, government, economy, money, education, and media. To deal with the

threat one must understand every one of these, despite misinformation. In every case, one

is running counter to the existing culture in pursuing truth, because the institutions of

society are (or, more hopefully, were, until recently) captured. There are relatively few

individuals with the capability and patience and time and resources to investigate so

many corners of Society and to feel confident enough in their observations that they may

Act.

Popularity may be over-rated, but it is natural for a person to enjoy acceptance, and when

not accepted to feel a degree of pain. When one examines and questions popular ideas,

humans take issue because they view it as criticism of themselves, and, with those

persons they feel they should have close relationships with, they view radical differences

of perception as a barrier to relationships. Thus, the members of Society who have

engaged in distilling Truth, often referred to as "Digital Warriors", have suffered isolation

and rejection, but enduring a degree of pain is necessary to any great human endeavor. It

is said that the Great Awakening is a proliferation of a daunting amount of concealed

Truth that, when disclosed, will change the perceived norms of Society, and transform it.

But for now, Digital Warriors are Radicals. In the future, as in the First American

Revolution (and all Digital Warriors hope that future is imminent), Digital Warriors will

be transformed from being known as Radicals to being known as Patriots.

>>14560614

1. Radical Reform

All reforms are thought of as radical when they are first suggested. Those who suggested

independence from England in 1763 were largely labeled with this term and shunned. By

1775, the radicals were now called patriots, and were seen as leaders. It took that much

time for challenges to the rights of people who thought of themselves as "free" to assert

that freedom and to push back against incursions upon it. It took that much time for

citizens to become aware of the need for a strong curative and to act, despite the risk of

some very negative consequences. But all the reforms and curative actions were at first

shunned and had no following.

In The Glorious Cause, Robert Middlekauff writes:

"What seemed to be only common sense to Thomas Paine, and to most Americans

in 1776, would have struck them as uncommon madness a dozen years before.

Paine's Common Sense, a sermon disguised as a political tract, informed

Americans that their long-standing connection to England was preposterous, that

it violated the laws of nature and of human reason, indeed that it aroused a

repugnancy in 'the universal order of things.' And as for the institution to which

they had always given their loyaltythe monarchyit was ridiculous, and as

unnatural as the traditional tie to the mother country. Monarchy, according to

Paine, had a heathenish origin; it had been instituted by the devil for the

promotion of idolatry. The word according to Thomas Paine was accepted easily

enough by most Americans; they were a church of the converted, and he gave

them exactly what they wanted to hear. They declared their independence six

months after his essay appeared, citing the laws of nature and nature's God as

justification." (pp. 3-4)

In the 60s the term "radical" was co-opted to represent communists and lawbreakers.

Rules For Radicals was a blueprint for admirers of communism, progressivism, and

socialism to act as "community organizers" to use politics to overcome government by

unworthy means, with a focus on lying and deceit. Other books by "radicals" encouraged

breaking any law that was inconvenient. However, the term "radical" should not be

permitted to be hijacked. In this case, it is "radical" to suggest strong punishments,

sequestrations, or other means of effectively dealing with the threat America has faced,

because all punishments or other measures that might work as a societal curative are

tagged, perhaps by deliberate propaganda, as cruel or as a governmental ("Fascist")

overreach.

One example of the attack on punishments as being cruel is the attitude toward spanking

children. The idea that spanking children who misbehave is cruel and unnecessary has

been spread throughout the society, perhaps disguised as a natural phenomenon of

societal evolution. It provides a profound example of what it means when we say

someone is a radical. A person who claims that children should be punished at an early

age when they do wrong, using pain (which in fact is a strong teacher, if one recalls the

saying, "once burned, twice shy"), instead of being counseled and told to stand in a

corner or go to one's room, this is now thought of very negatively. Never mind the facts,

which are, there once was a society in which people did not think they had to lock their

doors, or in which children simply did not talk back to their parents, and in which

children believed they had a Conscience. The facts are also, after one or two generations

in which children did not appear to learn early about what happens when one does the

wrong things, that as adults, they now seem to be wanting in morals and ethics and are

much more likely to think they will get away with doing wrong, and need not feel guilt or

remorse, even if something terrible happens to another person. If they get the slightest bit

of amusement from some action like throwing large rocks at automobiles from an

overpass to these, their actions were worth it, so long as they are not caught and

punished. Another problem worth mentioning is that since schools do not have any type

of physical punishment as a means of maintaining order, they now drug the miscreants,

under the assertion that all misbehavior represents some type of chemical imbalance or

condition (such as autism), which teaches these individuals little except to acclimate them

to a life of drug "therapy".

>>14560620

Yes, the relationship between spanking children and a corrupt, lawless, conscious-less

adult society is dubious, but so is the notion that the removal of this practice has been

replaced by something effective in producing moral, ethical, law-abiding citizens.

Further, it is worth noting that Society perhaps thinks that it perceives Progress as

eliminating Pain. Perhaps it is seen as idyllic to try to eliminate Pain from our existence.

A blanket observation like this is impossible to prove. But perhaps what we may come to

believe about this is, pain is impossible to eliminate from life; that if we do not

experience pain in measured amounts, used as a device in learning ethics and morality,

that in fact, we will experience pain later, and, in fact, that pain will be much. much

greater, inflicted on an unfathomable scale (as was visited upon the residents of

Hamelin). The endurance of Pain is also necessary to developing Courage, and without

Courage there is little hope of overcoming Evil. Without the Courage of a Lion, we

instead must have the Meekness of Sheep.

During the same period in which there is a transition from Honesty and Conscience, one

can see there is an attitude of the populace building up against capital punishment. This

flies in the face of the facts, which are, of those who receive incarceration instead of

capital punishment for capital crimes, a percentage of these get out of prison one way or

another, and a percentage of these do their bad deeds again, and even again and again,

such that more bad things happen to people in general than if the capital-felons were

executed in the first place. In this respect, what we are seeing is the result of the

overcoming of logic by emotion, backed up by, usually, a media focus on the perpetrators

rather than the victims, and an inability to visualize the consequences of what is thought

of as "mercy". The media focus might be a clue that the direction of society has resulted

from manipulation of thought.

>>14560625

The idea in mentioning these two examples is simply this: if one really wants to solve a

problem of society, the solution is not going to be derived and succeed by applying the

same tired attitudes and feelings and approaches that constrained the set of acceptable

solutions. If a problem is so large that unless it has solved one simply won't have a

society that one wants to live in, or even a society that is safe to live in, or one in which

one isn't liable to be poisoned or enslaved or stolen from or worse, then one is going to

have to reassess prior ideas and subordinate them to solving the problem. (Yes, we

thought our society was safe enough, and at the time of this writing there has not yet been

Disclosure, but based on reports, Disclosure will come soon enough with plenty of detail

that no civilized and even slightly empathic person wants to hear.) A solution should not

be simply discarded by making a blanket statement such as "that is cruel", "that is

unusual", or "that doesn't fit". Persons should realize when such a problem exists, learn

why they have not been able to deal with it, and try to understand whether the first step is

to harden themselves to implement a disagreeable but necessary remedy strong enough to

be a cure.

Looking at reform in this way, as radical, it should be understandable why we do not see

alternative news sites dedicated to discussing reform. Reform is unpopular, even in the

face of a threat. Reform starts in the minds of The Few. Alternative news is a new media

format born of necessity, but still responds to economic influence, still has bills to pay.

By discussing reform, it is a logical consequence that a site would lose following.

Alternative news sites have a mission in revealing Truth and they cannot hope to perform

this without viewership.

A failure by the populace to discuss reform, however, would be a major mistake. A major

problem is the rule of Elites. By live test it is patently observable that elites who rule

devise rules that favor elites. Further, when living life in a favored class, these persons for

the most part lose any empathy or even sympathy they might have had for commoners

and treat any hardship or worse that comes to those deemed beneath their station as

inconsequential. In that sort of isolated favoritism, it should be no surprise if elitism

jumps to slavery or eugenics or even holocaust. For this reason, the general populace

must discuss reforms, and there must be forums devised for this purpose.

But even though this is enough reason to have public discussion of reforms, there is still

another of equal significance. Even among a good elite, such as the one christened by

alternative news as the "White Hats", who are ascribed as dedicated to the removal of

society's bad actors and the implementation of good government, there can never be

consensus on strong actions the public is wont to reject. Good government does not

flourish in an atmosphere in which it is largely thought of as overreaching its authority.

Among a wise and moral elite there will be those who remind others of this when a

strong curative, strong enough to be effective, is suggested in closed-door meetings. If the

strong curative had the following needed, it would already have been suggested and

implemented. Therefore, relying on an elite to find consensus to effectively reform

society may result in a wait until either Hell freezes over or the Bad returns and perhaps

this time is victorious. A good elite cannot reform Society without a politically strong

following. The citizenry must discuss reforms, or anything offered as reform will be a

compromise that suffers from weakness and inability to perform its task.

>>14560601

>>14560614

>>14560620

>>14560625

>>14560635

This .pdf book is 48 pages long, and it's a work in progress; this is the first chapter along with the Foreword, the rest is in the .pdf file.

HIGHLY recommended read, it shows a vedry clear picture as to where we are in this time of history

>>14560647

Here's the last chapter, regarding the military:

18 The Military

This is a message to the White Hats and the Military.

You have embarked on a course from which there is no return. You have taken over

Government. You have painted yourself into a corner with paint that is deadly to walk on.

In this corner there are two doors, a White Door, and a Gray Door. We should talk about

what's behind the White Door, because as you will realize is true, the Gray Door

inevitably turns Red and then Black.

To proceed through the White Door, you must embrace Truth, The Whole Truth, and

Nothing but The Truth. There can be no shilly-shallying around asking people how much

of The Truth can we tell the Public. There must be complete Disclosure. There can no

longer be Elites who decide what they want others to know because they then decide,

even for the truth they are willing to disclose, how to word it to fit with a narrative that

benefits them or their cronies. Once there is a point where Secrecy takes over, that point

is in motion and maneuvered politically and there simply is no spot at which it may drop

anchor successfully. On top of that, the Truth is difficult and expensive to suppress, and

over time that difficulty and expense (and nefarious activity like "retirement-murder")

mushroom until finally there is an explosion of Disclosure.

You will have to disseminate Truth throughout the populace. The precedent for this is the

practice in World War II where Allied forces required all German citizens to walk

through the concentration camps before they could receive their ration cards. The same

need for relief now exists. As a prerequisite to relief or its continuance you must require

the populace to witness the wrongdoing and understand what good government and what

bad government is so they can understand how and why the wrongdoing happened. This

means viewing videotapes, walking through hospitals where "little people" are being

cared for, seeing tunnels and DUMBs, listening to confessions, listening to the tales of

dead people who aren't dead, and remedial training in The Idea of America, Citizenship,

Morality, Ethics, Sound Money, and The Constitution. As you can see, this is not a

simple problem anymore, as simple as leading an occupied population through a camp

one time.

There is no Emperor of Socialism (as in Japan) to order this part of our nation to comply

with the requirements of citizenship. There is no Military Commander (as in the Civil

War) to sign articles of surrender and tell the population to go home and become good

citizens. Only some of those doing wrong in this country are going to change their

attitude and embrace The Idea of America and disavow Socialism and become good

citizens. For some others, only force means anything to them. They have been brought to

believe America is inherently evil and that they have a right to whatever is not nailed

down. Unfortunately, the infrastructure of America is vulnerable, and these persons will

think they can make a living out of surreptitiously gathering funds to finance and fight a

guerilla war. You will have to deal with this type of activity using harsh cures.

>>14560655

You will also have to establish Good Government. This means reforming Government, so

it performs its rightful tasks, such as repairing infrastructure, maintaining the Parks,

providing power and water to The People, and providing unrestricted communications

(such as ending the telephonic assault by scammers on the populace, which has been a

nightmare for The People, unassisted, to resolve). This means identifying the purpose of

chemtrails to the Public and from there deriving a consensus for their continuance or

turning them off. It means releasing the Truth about numerous Events such as 9-11, the

JFK assassination, the Apollo program, and many instances of weather warfare. This also

means destroying Socialism at its root. Any impetus for Socialism must be denied the

Public Bullhorn and denied a place at the table of government and the advocates of

Socialism must find on social media that their entreaties are unviewable. Those who

espoused Socialism must be denied any further career in government or in any form of

communications or education. Remember, Socialism is not "politics", it is crime. We are

witness to where this crime leads because we are there. Socialism cannot be permitted to

return.

To affect the demise of socialism, the Constitution will have to be amended. This should

be less difficult than one might imagine since the states in rebellion must revert to the

status of territories until they are "reconstructed". The remaining States will be happy to

embrace a means by which bad government is now treated as criminal. the US will have

to guarantee a republican form of government in every State, and that does not mean

permitting tribalistic, divisive, anti-American, financially unstable, and (by natural law)

criminal government in States or even in counties or cities or towns. Liberty must be a

product of every level of Government for it to prevail. The federal government must be a

guarantor of Liberty.

Once passing through the white door, there can be no more doubles, clones, or

masquerades. It is obvious that legislators must be who they say they are. There can be no

more replacement of persons by means of masks or any other devices, to continue their

careers despite being ill or sequestered or dead. If there is a problem maintaining security

of the President, then perhaps there should be two presidents, one designated for the

ceremonial and public appearances, with the authority to deliver the words of the other

President in speeches.

Do you hesitate to open and pass through the White Door? Well, then, what is behind the

Gray Door?

The Gray Door leads inevitably to the demise of all the military who took control for the

sake of the Constitution and their sworn Oath. Socialism must either be treated as a

reasonable basis for government or destroyed. If the Military decline to destroy

Socialism, it will return. Some of the first moneys that it acquires will likely be dedicated

to dealing with a list of military leaders they see as traitors. Whether the means is lawfare

or some form of murder or mayhem, visited upon either these leaders or anyone they hold

dear, the Socialists understand now that military leaders never really retire, they are never

released from their Oath, and are their sworn enemies.

>>14560658

By embarking upon a rescue of America from foreign and domestic enemies, you have

now emulated the signers of the Declaration of Independence. You have signed your

death warrant should this rescue fail. The Signers closed their Declaration with:

"And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of

divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and

our sacred Honor."

You must realize, Socialism cares little about the rights of individuals. It divides people

into classes. As a class the Military have been required to think for themselves, as they

are instructed not to follow an unlawful order, upon pain of prosecution. Socialism thinks

nothing of doing away with entire classes of citizens. It is too large a problem for them to

wait until some of these acts and only then to prosecute the actors. This is the Second

American Revolution, and without signing anything you are in the same status as the

original Patriots. Your lives, your fortunes, and your sacred honor are all at stake if you

do not prevail in establishing good government that will endure for the balance of your

lives. To do this, Benjamin Franklin would tell you, "We must hang together or surely we

shall hang separately."

Opting for the Gray Door would mean most probably that you, individually, though a

member of the military, have qualms about using force against domestic enemies. Being

a defender at the Gates of the nation or for international commerce or against kinetic

warfare may seem much more reasonable and justifiable. The justification for War may

seem to you to boil down to being placed in "it is him or me" circumstances. The notion

of a war of ideas, and that America itself is an idea, and that it is this Idea that men die

for and not a fruited plain or mountain majesties, may seem far afield. After all, there are

other nations, and those nations have patriots, and their nations are not ideas. What you

are confronted with now, though, is that the entire world was captured by Tyranny, save

for Americans who treasured Liberty in their hearts, and these devised a Plan for its

return, and now that Plan is on the Brink of success. America was the last respite of

Liberty, based on a simple Oath to support and defend the Constitution against all

enemies, foreign and domestic. That Oath is the basis of your sacred honor. You must

fulfill that Oath.

The Gray Door may also be thought of as a path of least resistance, which it is, for a time.

Rather than use force to require compliance, why not simply write everyone a check and

then tell them to sign off on something? One check then becomes two and then the Dole,

with strings attached, and while the nation is trying to stop the manipulation of its

economy so that price discovery works, and so that efficiency means The People are

adding value and creating wealth, instead, there is manipulation of The People, which is

an overhead cost, who then must keep re-electing those who support their dole, and there

is the taxation of anyone working to pay people not to work and to be political supporters

for perpetuating this. Mailing out checks is a simplistic solution that is only thought of

when a nation is not serious about solving problems.

>>14560659

The purveyors of Socialism are domestic enemies. They want to use the Treasury as a

means of political control. Once they can write checks, they solidify their power, and

from there we have The Present. If Socialism is not condemned, abolished, and

suppressed, this Present will remain. You do not have much of a future in this Present.

If the US Military were now to pass through the Gray Door, and if Socialists return to

power, it should not be surprising, it should even be expected, that there would be a purge

of the military, as this is the only place from which a well-organized counter-revolution

could emerge. Perhaps a purge would be to the degree to which Stalin purged the military

in 1937-8. By report an intercepted list was released of US commanders the CCP planned

to purge (execute), once chaos was brought about and "UN (actually CCP) soldiers" were

invited in to restore order, that convinced a number of "fence-sitters" to join the White

Hats. This falls into line with reports of lists (coded by color) of citizens from over a

decade before that identified citizens who also were designated to suffer from a purge.

While reports of this type seem fantastic, discernment requires "following down the

rabbit hole" to a conclusion before discounting reports that don't revolve around former

norms. In fact, a reader of science fiction would, in these times, feel that if many of the

reports one reads are untrue and made up, that the creativity of science fiction writers

must somehow have increased over the last decade by several orders of magnitude.

It is safe to conclude that any person retiring from military service at this point cannot

retire even to an isolated life of fishing and hunting, and feel secure, when receiving a

retirement account that identifies a clear path to one's bank account and home, and that

one cannot be certain that should Socialism ever re-emerge, there will not be severe

consequences to pay. It is a matter of survival, or at least one of peace of mind for

military members, that every effort be made to stamp out Socialism and to educate the

citizenry on why this must be done. If not, the Gray Door will be stained with the blood

of patriots and become the Black Door of a sarcophagus.

>>14560661

Afterword

This book tries to fill a perceived void after searching for websites and books that try to

specifically identify the reforms needed in a society, one that has been captured by a

rogue, criminal elite, instituting legislative laws to make its criminality "legal", and in

which this is proven to be an intolerable source of Tyranny, and after Discernment,

Disclosure, Arrests, and Justice, the society is resolved there shall be no recurrence. If

there are those who feel it is alright to tolerate this type and level of criminality, probably

because they avoided, by chance or privilege, personally suffering the ills visited upon

the country as a whole, and are thus unwilling to lift a finger to try to build or rebuild the

society of Liberty the Founding Fathers attempted to construct, these persons deserve to

live forever under Tyranny and for that tyranny to wreak its greatest havoc upon them

personally. If there are those who think the ills America has observed simply arose by the

faintest chance, that nothing systemic really needs to be fixed, and that these ills could

never arise again, these persons need to swallow a Red Pill and wake up. If there are

those who think it is alright to follow the crowd and do no thinking for themselves,

because public acceptance is dearer than reason, they need to be thoroughly scolded by

their mothers, as was the author, with the question, "Why don't you start using your head

for something besides a hat rack?!"

Outlawing the criminality of government is not an option, it is a necessity. Criminal

parasites have been laughing themselves all the way to the bank over how easy they

found it to avoid working and exploit the system for its wealth with no consequences.

This is not the time to take two aspirins and call someone next decade. The persons who

visited the attempted destruction of the nation upon America and who dragged the

American Idea in the mud must be permanently removed from influence and wealth

(which is influence) and "processed" (at GITMO) and, as necessary, sequestered or

"taken off the Earth plane". The governmental system, meanwhile, must be altered to

remove the loopholes and workarounds found to subvert the system and harvest its

wealth, and the level of detection, indictment, and punishment must deter those

contemplating a repeat of these criminal activities. Anyone who thinks e pluribus unum

(from many, one) needs to be rewritten, and that United We Stand, Divided We Fall is

passé, needs to try out their theories on an island preserve with like-minded persons.

Anyone who thinks it is okay to lie, cheat, and steal, so long as they personally benefit or

it "feels good", needs to be sent back to Sodom and Gomorrah, to just before God got

angry. Truth, Justice, and the American Way must not be a fantasy. This is not the time

to put the nation on cruise control and see where inertia takes it. Every person who

believes they are an American because they believe in the American Idea needs now to

prove it by actively working toward a curative that reinforces the intent of the

Constitution.

Anyone who thinks this is not stated forcefully enough, such that they need some

additional motivation to act, the author requests you visit any US Chief Master Sergeant,

or Marine Drill Instructor, or both, whether on active duty or retired, and ask for their

unvarnished interpretation of these remarks.

>>14560680

Exactly what I figure

>>14560696

Interesting! And Nancy Drew on Telegram is posting about the lack of people at the mall. Won't SHE be happy to see POTUS!

>>14560746

Only FBI fags and Clowns will be doing anything, POTUS is safe