I am writing to inform you of a serious case of Fraud Against the Government by both John Owen Brennan and The Analysis Corporation (and its successor companies). My allegations are based on my personal experience, public information, and government records.

Fraud Against the Government by way of Fraud in the Inducement (18 USC sec. 1031) & Conspiracy to Defraud the Government (18 U.S.C. 371):

John Owen Brennan, along with unnamed co-conspirators, used his offices as:

• Director of the CIA’s Terrorist Threat Integration Center (TTIC), and as:

• Director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), and as:

• CEO and President of The Analysis Corporation, Inc. (TAC), and as:

• President’s National Security Advisor for Counterterrorism (NSA/CT), and subsequently as:

• Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (DCI),

to establish a Counterterrorism Intelligence Information-monopoly (CT Intel monopoly) of all counterterrorism intelligence available to the U.S. Government in order to “front-run” terror attacks for personal financial gain.

Brennan, and unknown co-conspirators, used this CT Intel monopoly to withhold, from appropriate U.S. authorities, the information needed to prevent specific terror attacks and allowed those attacks to succeed. The successful attacks resulted in the death and serious injury of both U.S. and allied nation citizens. The resulting public outcry over these terror attacks caused significantly increased funding to a specific government contractor – The Analysis Corporation (TAC), and its successor companies. Brennan intentionally concealed his proprietary ownership in TAC, and its successor companies, by making, or causing to be made, numerous false official statements in the form of Financial Disclosure Forms (SF-278 & 278e), as well as, causing fraudulent Ethics Waivers to be issued and making a fraudulent Ethics Statements to the U.S. Senate, to further conceal his criminal actions.

Brennan’s purpose in enabling a select few terror attacks to succeed was to induce the U.S. Government to provide increasing amounts of money to The Analysis Corporation (TAC), and its successor companies. Brennan personally benefited from the increase in federal spending because the augmented funding significantly increased the value of his personal financial holdings in TAC; in violation of federal Conflict of Interest Laws (18 USC sec. 208). Brennan’s activity also violated laws regarding the Deprivation of Civil Rights under Color of Official Right (18 USC sec. 242); Fraud Against the Government by Way of Inducement (18 USC sec. 1031); and Treason, by providing aid and comfort to the enemy during a time of war (18 USC sec. 2381).

>>14565706By means of this Fraud-in-the-Inducement scheme (18 USC sec. 1031), Brennan, and unnamed co-conspirators, was able to convert his proprietary ownership of approximately 1,372 shares in common stock in The Analysis Corporation (TAC), valued at approximately $50,000 in 20091, into approximately 200,000 shares of successor company stock (NASDAQ: GTEC), valued at $2,100,000 in 2010.

By April 2011, the value of Brennan’s stock holding in GTEC increased to $4,850,000 following the acquisition of GTEC by Ares Management, who took the company private.2 Brennan hid this financial windfall from public view by knowingly concealing it in his TAC 401K account. Brennan was apparently advised by the Office of Government Ethics that owning this stock was a violation of the Federal Conflict of Interest law.3 Brennan knowingly misrepresented the monetary value of, and mischaracterized the composition of, his 401k accounts on his Financial Disclosure forms for 8 consecutive years (2010-2017). Brennan filed a false official statement when he became Director CIA on Mar 8, 2013,4 and each subsequent year as the Director. Brennan’s last False Official Statement to conceal this fraud scheme was in May 2017.5

>>14565714 John O. Brennan, Executive Branch Financial Disclosure (SF-278), dated Feb 17, 2009; http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/Brennan.pdf 2 Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc., Form S-8, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1, dated Apr 4, 2011; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000095012311032487/c15093sv8pos.htm

>>14565757 John O. Brennan, Executive Branch Financial Disclosure (SF-278), dated Feb 17, 2009; http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/Brennan.pdf . A handwritten notation on Brennan’s onboarding SF-278 indicates he knew of this conflict of interest. The handwritten note, “…** per the filer, in the process of rolling over Analysis Corp 401K into IRA. – REM 02.17.09…” was written by the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) official who went over the SF-278 with Brennan to ferret out any conflicts of interest.4 John O. Brennan, Executive Branch Personnel PUBLIC FINANCE DISCLOSURE, OGE Form 278 (Rev. 12/2011); dated 03-08-2013; https://cryptome.org/2015/06/cia-john-brennan-financial.pdf 5 John O. Brennan Separation Financial Disclosure Form e278, dated April 4, 2017.6 “Intel Firm Paid CIA Nominee Well As He Left for White House”, by Ralph Turchiano, Feb 10, 2013, which included an article by Aram Roston, dated Feb 4, 2013; https://clinicalnews.org/2013/02/10/intel-firm-paid-cia-nominee-well-as-he-left-for-white-house/ 7 https://www.chron.com/news/article/PRN-The-Analysis-Corporation-and-Infoglide-1859462.php8 https://www.chron.com/news/article/PRN-The-Analysis-Corporation-and-Infoglide-1859462.php9 https://www.chron.com/news/article/PRN-The-Analysis-Corporation-and-Infoglide-1859462.php

>>14565774 John O. Brennan, Executive Branch Financial Disclosure (SF-278), dated Feb 17, 2009;

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/Brennan.pdf . A handwritten notation on Brennan’s onboarding SF-278 indicates he knew of this conflict of interest. The handwritten note, “…** per the filer, in the process of rolling over Analysis Corp 401K into IRA. – REM 02.17.09…” was written by the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) official who went over the SF-278 with Brennan to ferret out any conflicts of interest.

4 John O. Brennan, Executive Branch Personnel PUBLIC FINANCE DISCLOSURE, OGE Form 278 (Rev. 12/2011); dated 03-08-2013; https://cryptome.org/2015/06/cia-john-brennan-financial.pdf

5 John O. Brennan Separation Financial Disclosure Form e278, dated April 4, 2017.

6 “Intel Firm Paid CIA Nominee Well As He Left for White House”, by Ralph Turchiano, Feb 10, 2013, which included an article by Aram Roston, dated Feb 4, 2013; https://clinicalnews.org/2013/02/10/intel-firm-paid-cia-nominee-well-as-he-left-for-white-house/

7 https://www.chron.com/news/article/PRN-The-Analysis-Corporation-and-Infoglide-1859462.php

8 https://www.chron.com/news/article/PRN-The-Analysis-Corporation-and-Infoglide-1859462.php

9 https://www.chron.com/news/article/PRN-The-Analysis-Corporation-and-Infoglide-1859462.php

>>14565706

14565757

14565785

Sauce provided. I have 27-pages more open source reporting this traitor.

The background of the Fraud.

Brennan, and others unnamed, used the confusion of the reorganization of the U.S. Intelligence Community following the September 11, 2001 attacks, and their high ranking positions in the government, to establish a Counterterrorism Intelligence Information-monopoly of all counterterrorism intelligence available to the U.S. government (CT Intel monopoly). The establishment of this “CT Intel monopoly” was carried out in a deliberate manner to ensure a small group of individuals could “front run” future terrorism incidents and thereby increase the share value of an indispensable government contractor – The Analysis Corporation (TAC), and its successor companies. Such a scheme would enrich the shareholders of TAC, but first TAC needed to be converted into a publicly traded company to maximize the potential financial gains for stockholders.

The Analysis Corporation (TAC) has been a classified contractor for the CIA and the U. S. Department of State since 1990.6 TAC designed and maintained the State Department’s TIPOFF list, an early version of the terrorist watch list, using proprietary and copyrighted software. TAC provided proprietary and copyrighted computer software programs to track individuals in travel databases starting with FUZZY FINDER (launched 1990)7, Arabic Name Search (launched 1997)8, and Russian Name Search (in 2000).9

Owning the proprietary software that made important national security programs of the U.S. Government possible is akin to owning the “double-click” patent/copyright. Almost every website in the world uses the “double-click” feature and each website must pay the holder of the “double-click” patent/copyright a fee to cover whenever a site-user “double-clicks” a link on a website. TAC holds similar intellectual property rights vis-à-vis the U.S. Intelligence Community.

FUZZY FINDER “…has been continuously operational within the government [since 1990] and has been a very effective tool for finding the names of suspected or known terrorists in various databases…”10

FUZZY FINDER was able to match various anglicized versions of names, originally written in non-English alphabets (Arabic, Cyrillic, etc.), with a particular individual traveler or visa holder, no matter which variant of the English spelling the individual used.11 TAC’s intellectual property formed the foundation of any terrorist tracking effort by the U.S. Government. FUZZY FINDER and TAC’s other proprietary programs established TAC as the indispensable government contractor following the 9-11 attacks.

FUZZY FINDER, et al, figured prominently in identifying this complex and long running scheme to defraud the government.12 The U.S. Intelligence Community claimed, falsely, on numerous occasions, that its inability to identify the anglicized version of the non-English names of two terrorists in various travel related databases, was a partial cause of these terrorists’ success in terrorizing, killing, and maiming American citizens. The two terrorists were Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab13 14 and Tamerlan Tsarnaev15, the Boston Marathon bomber.

Abdulmutallab and Tsarnaev succeeded in terrorizing the American public while Brennan was either the President’s NSA/CT, or the Director of the CIA. In either government office, Brennan’s official decisions could reasonably be believed to affect the value of TAC, the indispensable government contractor,for his personal financial benefit in violation of Federal Conflict of Interest Laws (18 USC sec. 208).

10 PRNewswire “The Analysis Corporation and Infoglide Software Announce Strategic Alliance. Sep 5, 2006, and updated Aug 11, 2011; https://www.chron.com/news/article/PRN-The-Analysis-Corporation-and-Infoglide-1859462.php

11 For example, the Arabic name Mohammed can be spelled Muhammad, Mohammad, Muhammed, Mohamed, Mohamad, Muhamad, Muhamed, Mohamud, Mohummad, Mohummed, Mouhamed, Mohammod and Mouhamad in English – and TAC’s proprietary program Fuzzy Finder enables the system to look through each variant to identify the traveller.

12 PRNewswire “The Analysis Corporation and Infoglide Software Announce Strategic Alliance. Sep 5, 2006, and updated Aug 11, 2011; https://www.chron.com/news/article/PRN-The-Analysis-Corporation-and-Infoglide-1859462.php

13 https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/FOIA/Report_to_the_Director_of_National_Intelligence_on_the_Fort_Hood_and_Northwest_Flight_253_Incidents_U.pdf, page 14

14 Ibid, Page 6

15 Intelligence Community OIG Unclassified Report on Boston Marathon Bombings, Page 8; https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2014/s1404.pdf

he Establishment of the Monopoly:

President George W. Bush directed the FBI, CIA, Homeland Security, and the Department of

Defense to establish the Terrorist Threat Integration Center (TTIC) to merge and analyze all

Terror threat information in a single location [emphasis added] during his January 28, 2003 State of

the Union Address.16 Subsequently, TAC was bought by, and made a wholly owned subsidiary

of Sachs Freeman Associates, Inc. (SFA, Inc.), a well-established government contracting

company. On March 12, 2003 CIA Director George Tenet assigned his former Chief of Staff,

John Owen Brennan, to become the first director of the TTIC.17

On May 1, 2003, the TTIC opened its doors. John O. Brennan, Director TTIC, filled its ranks with approximately three dozen detailees from across the US Government (USG)

and was mandated to integrate CT capabilities and missions across the government.18 Brennan

was enabled to establish his “CT Intel monopoly” by executive order.

Brennan himself stated, “… The idea behind TTIC was that we needed to have someplace in

the government where all counterterrorism information would reside [emphasis added].

Eventually, information from all 26 classified and unclassified networks flowed into TTIC; [TTIC]

wanted voyeuristic capability [into the activities and records of the entire Intelligence

Community. The good news and the bad news: [TTIC] had more access to

more information than anywhere in the government [emphasis added]…”19 20

On August 27, 2004, President George W. Bush converted TTIC into the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) via executive order 13354.21 22 The NCTC had two core missions:

to serve as the primary organization in the U.S. Government for analysis and integration of all terrorism intelligence, and

to conduct strategic operational planning (SOP) for counterterrorism activities integrating all elements of U.S. national power.23

Brennan continued as the director of TTIC as it transitioned into the NCTC, and then Brennan was appointed interim Director NCTC on October 27, 2004. 24 25 26 Under Brennan’s leadership the TTIC, and then the NCTC, “… [had] the responsibility to provide integrated assessments of the terrorist threat; for example, when there are Principals Committee meeting (sic) or Deputies Committee meetings or the president needs to be briefed on something about the terrorist threat, TTIC [later the NCTC] represents the view from throughout the community…that is sort of a unique responsibility that we have on behalf of those partner agencies [emphasis added]…”27

Brennan was able to establish the CT Intel monopoly from the intake of the raw intelligence information all the way to the Office of the President of the United States. Brennan stated, “… [NCTC] is the mission manager on terrorism for the [entire Intelligence] community as far as the collection requirement system is concerned. We… play a lead role; we work with the other agencies and departments to determine the national intelligence priorities framework [emphasis added]…”28

In the above statements, Brennan clearly described how his new agency is the mission manager for collection requirements for the entire intelligence community (i.e. NCTC directs what information other agencies, like the NSA, collect for CT purposes and to whom those collectors report the information).

To describe the depth of penetration the NCTC’s CT Intel monopoly had into FBI and CIA internal records and information systems, Brennan provided the following observations:

“…The FBI has the responsibility for working with local law enforcement as far as getting information that is relevant to the terrorist threat…The FBI puts all that information into its databases and information systems, and the [CT Intel monopoly] has unfettered access to those FBI systems….”29 “…Data does not have to be pushed to us by the FBI or other organizations. That’s the great thing about [the CT Intel monopoly], we don’t have to rely on CIA or FBI or others to package up information and send it to us. We have full real-time visibility into their information systems and databases. So anything that’s committed to an electron in the FBI system or the CIA system, we have real-time access to it [emphasis added]…”30

And

“…we at [the CT Intel monopoly] have full and unfettered access to [CIA Directorate of Operations (DO)] information systems, DO cable traffic and DO databases [emphasis added]…”31 DHS analysts [in the CT Intel monopoly] have visibility into the CIA and FBI databases and information systems, and if [our analysts] see anything that is of relevance to the Department of Homeland Security that has not yet been formally disseminated, we have mechanisms in place that allow that analysts (sic) to go back to CIA or the FBI and say, “you may not realize this, but this information is important…”32

>>14565922

Sauce

1. Intelligence Community OIG Unclassified Report on Boston Marathon Bombings, Page 8; https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2014/s1404.pdf

16 https://www.dni.gov/index.php/nctc-who-we-are/history

17 Obama White House Blog page biography of John Brennan, retrieved Mar 2, 2021; https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/author/john-BRENNAN

18 https://www.dni.gov/index.php/nctc-who-we-are/history

19 “Intelligence Transformation and the Impact on Counterterrorism Programs” Presentation by John Brennan, President and CEO, The Analysis Corporation, Oct 18, 2006, reported by Stephanie Kaplan; http://web.mit.edu/SSP/seminars/wed_archives06fall/BRENNAN.htm

20 An Interview with TTIC Director John Brennan, published in Studies in Intelligence Vol. 48, No. 4, dated Mar 12, 2003, and declassified on Sep 3, 2014, Document number C05618307, https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005618307.pdf ; see also https://ia600906.us.archive.org/10/items/CIA-Studies-In-Intelligence-Declassified/DOC_0005618307.pdf

21 https://www.dni.gov/index.php/nctc-who-we-are/history22 Intelligence Community OIG Unclassified Report on Boston Marathon Bombings, Page 6; https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2014/s1404.pdf

23 John Scott Redd, Adm. USN (Ret.) Wikipedia entry retrieved Mar 2, 2021; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Scott_Redd

24 An Interview with TTIC Director John Brennan, published in Studies in Intelligence Vol. 48, No. 4, dated Mar 12, 2003, and declassified on Sep 3, 2014, Document number C05618307, https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005618307.pdf ; see also https://ia600906.us.archive.org/10/items/CIA-Studies-In-Intelligence-Declassified/DOC_0005618307.pdf

25 https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/author/john-BRENNAN

26 An Interview with TTIC Director John Brennan, Mar 12, 2003 (supra) https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005618307.pdf

27 Ibid.

The significance of the above two paragraphs:

NCTC personnel can peruse the contents of FBI and CIA databases and electronic communications at will, in real time, with no oversight, but HAVE NO OBLIGATION to reveal to either agency what NCTC personnel actually reviewed in either agency’s files, or what importance the NCTC personnel attached to the information they found.

NCTC can review initial information about a person in both FBI and CIA file and communication systems without the direct oversight of either organization. NCTC can use this unprecedented access to “spot” a potential terrorist before either the FBI or the CIA are even able to assign an agent or analyst to review the information. These circumstances existed in both the Christmas Eve 2009 Northwest Flight 253 bombing and the 2013 Boston Marathon Bombing.

>>14565934

Sauce

28 An Interview with TTIC Director John Brennan, Mar 12, 2003 (supra) https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005618307.pdf

29 Ibid.

30 Ibid.

31 An Interview with TTIC Director John Brennan, Mar 12, 2003 (supra) https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005618307.pdf

32 Ibid.

NCTC’s intrusive access to FBI and CIA communication systems allows a bad actor in the NCTC to pick and choose (classify and compartmentalize) which additional intelligence collected by the NSA will be allowed to filter down to the FBI Case Agent conducting a Guardian assessment or investigation. By filtering out just enough key information to hamstring an FBI Guardian investigation, the bad actor at the NCTC can set up the potential terrorist to succeed, and for the FBI to be seen by the public to fail.

For example, the Boston Marathon bomber – Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was first reported to the FBI as a potential terror threat by way of an initial message from a foreign intelligence service, the Russian FSB.33 The FSB informed the FBI they considered Tamerlan Tsarnaev a terror threat based on Tsarnaev’s online activity, telephone conversations with his mother, and contact Tsarnaev had with two additional suspected terrorists.34 This initial FSB communication, which included Tsarnaev’s telephone numbers, email address, and transliterated versions of Tsarnaev and his mother’s last names (FUZZY FINDER), became available to the NCTC at the same time it arrived in FBI communication channels at FBIHQ; and before an investigative lead could be set in the FBI’s central records system.

With this initial information, an NCTC analyst, with the help of FUZZY FINDER™, and Russian Name Search™, could search all 26 Intelligence Community databases, sift through social media posts, and conduct a separate assessment on Tsarnaev before the investigative lead was even assigned to an FBI Agent. With their advance knowledge, the NCTC could then front run the FBI investigation by tasking the NSA to send Tsarnaev-related information to the NCTC instead of the FBI; preventing the FBI from having a chance to look at the information.

The Intelligence Community’s OIG’s unclassified report contains a reference to the FBI LEGAT Moscow stating his opinion that [redacted 3 character agency abbreviation] would have recordings of Tsarnaev’s international telephone conversations.35 Only one agency fits this description – the NSA; but the FBI Guardian investigation did not locate any such references.36

The Department of Justice OIG post-bombing review of FBI systems did not locate any of Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s overseas telephone call information, or travel information, either.37

In addition, a known contact of Tsarnaev was Musa Khadjimuradov, a political asylee in America and an aid to Akhmed Zayakev, the Prime Minister of the Chechen Republic in-exile in the United Kingdom.38 As an aid to a government in-exile Khadjimuradov would have been subject to NSA monitoring. Under the NSA two-hop rule, Tsarnaev’s electronic communications would have been subject to NSA monitoring as well. So, not only would the NSA have picked up Tsarnaev’s calls and emails to Russia, but they would have also picked up his other electronic communications under the two-hop rule.

>>14565948

Sauce

33 Intelligence Community OIG Unclassified Report on Boston Marathon Bombings, Page 7; https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2014/s1404.pdf

34 The Road to Boston: Counterterrorism Challenges and Lessons from the Marathon Bombings; House Homeland Security Committee Report, March 2014; Pages 14 & 15 https://fas.org/irp/congress/2014_rpt/boston.pdf

35 Intelligence Community OIG Unclassified Report on Boston Marathon Bombings,; https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2014/s1404.pdf

36 Ibid., Page 9

37 Ibid., Page 9

38 https://www.insidevoa.com/a/voa-exclusive-boston-bombing-suspect-met-former-chechen-rebel-before-attack/1662484.html

***The Department of Justice Office of Inspector General’s failure to find any such information during its follow up review of the FBI Guardian investigation indicates either the NSA missed the data completely (unlikely), or the data was sequestered away from non-authorized “eyes” [compartmentalized] after it was collected by the NSA. Only the NCTC had the authority to direct such compartmentalization.

The sequestering, or compartmentalization, of the Tsarnaev data is the most likely reason why the FBI Guardian investigation erroneously concluded Tsarnaev was not a terror threat – and, as noted above, the NCTC has the authority to direct the NSA to compartmentalize (i.e. hide) this data from the FBI.

The NCTC’s intelligence tasking authority allows it to modify intelligence collection priorities, vis-à-vis a person of interest, so that only NCTC receives any additional information on that target from raw intelligence collectors (such as the NSA’s PRISM & XKeyScore type programs). This is a perfect set up for a small group of individuals to front-run a future terror attack for financial gain.

This document will show the overwhelming evidence that the NCTC’s extraordinary operating authority was used to enable select terrorists to succeed, and organized efforts to cover up the NCTC’s involvement. Withholding key information from the appropriate U.S. authorities in order to allow certain terrorist attacks to succeed, resulting in the death and serious injury of citizens of both the U.S. and allied nations, is defined as “…providing aid and comfort to the enemy…” (Treason, 18 USC sec. 2381).

>>14565965The intentional failure to prevent these terrorist attacks, despite having significant advanced warnings and indications, induced the U.S. government to increase counterterrorism spending year after year. In just the case of TAC, and its successor companies, the aggregate of the increased spending from TTIC’s 2003 founding to the present day is estimated to be $2.2 billion. The increased counterterrorism spending resulted in increasing the value of Brennan’s personal equity stake in TAC, and its successor companies, from a self-reported $50,000 in 2009 to over $4,850,000 by 2011. Brennan continued to hide this windfall in his 401k account as late as May 2017.39

39 John O. Brennan Separation Financial Disclosure Form e278, dated April 4, 2017.

Overt Illegal Acts to pursue the Fraud:

Brennan knowingly maintained his proprietary equity position in TAC, and its successor companies, in violation of Conflict of Interest laws (18 U.S. Code section 208), from January 20, 2009 through January 20, 2017. This 8-year period coincided with Brennan’s tenure as the President’s NSA/CT and Director CIA. In both offices, Brennan made numerous decisions that would logically be expected to affect the value of his equity stake in TAC, and its successor companies, in clear violation of relevant Conflict of Interest laws.

Brennan’s own filings indicate he was informed of this conflict of interest in February 2009 during his on-boarding processing as the President’s NSA/CT.40 In furtherance of this scheme to defraud, Brennan misled an Office of Government Ethics (OGE) official by stating he would dispose of the assets in his TAC 401K account, causing the OGE official to make a false official statement on the same Form SF-278.41

40 A handwritten notation on Brennan’s Feb 17, 2009 onboarding SF-278 indicates he knew of this conflict of interest. The handwritten note, “…** per the filer, in the process of rolling over Analysis Corp 401K into IRA. – REM 02.17.09…” was written by the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) official who went over the SF-278 with Brennan to ferret out any conflicts of interest.

41 Financial Disclosure Form SF-278 for John O. Brennan, Dated February 17, 2009

Instead of converting the assets as promised, Brennan simply changed the name of the account in which the assets were held from “TAC 401K” to “Sotera 401K”, and caused the Obama Administration to issue him a fraudulent Ethics Waiver which intentionally mis-represented the current name of the indispensable government contractor to hide Brennan’s continued proprietary ownership of the indispensable government contractor.42

The reason the name of Brennan’s 401K account changed from “TAC 401K” to “Sotera 401K” was due to name, and ownership changes, of TAC, and its successor companies, under contractual requirements written by Brennan himself. When Brennan was President and CEO of TAC, from November 7, 2005 until joining the Obama Administration in January 2009, he ensured the company’s employee benefits program would pass-through from one successor corporate entity to the next without any changes to the content of employee (and ex-employee) 401k accounts.43

Brennan’s updating of the account name on his financial disclosure forms indicates his knowledge of both the contents of the accounts (shares of stock in TAC and/or its successor companies), as well as, the conflict of interest, by continuing to own these assets while in a decision making position that may affect the value of the companies involved.44 Further evidence of Brennan’s knowingly hiding his proprietary interest was revealed during his transition from the President’s NSA/CT to Director CIA in the January 2013 to March 2013 timeframe.

Transition Time Frame

The proximity of the meetings between Brennan and key individuals in the following timeline are significant:

1/07/2013 Brennan was nominated by POTUS to be Director CIA

1/14/2013 Brennan, POTUS & Saudi Intelligence Chief held a morning meeting in the Oval Office where the Saudi Intelligence Chief reportedly informed POTUS and Brennan to beware of Tamerlan Tsarnaev.45

1/14/2013 Following the Oval Office meeting Brennan made an appointment to meet with Alexander Drew, President - Intelligence Operations, for the TAC successor company Sotera Defense Solutions, and Drew’s wife, Andrea M. Solomon Drew, who just happened to be the Assistant Inspector General of the CIA.46

1/16/2013 Brennan met with Alexander Drew, Sotera Defense Solutions, and his wife, Assistant IG of the CIA Andrea M. Solomon Drew, in the West Wing.47

42 Electronic Financial Disclosure Forms for John O. Brennan for the years 2013 through 2017

43 “…As with our employee benefits, there will be no change to GTEC’s current 401(k) plan…”; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000095012311021718/c13608sc14d9c.htm

44 https://cryptome.org/2015/06/cia-john-brennan-financial.pdf

45 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2317493/Saudi-Arabian-ambassador-Washington-DENIES-nation-warned-United-States-Tamerlan-Tsarnaev-2012.html

46 White House Visitor Log found on https://qresear.ch/?q=john+brennan

47 White House Visitor Log found on https://qresear.ch/?q=john+brennan

On July 8, 2021 the entries in qresear.ch regarding John Brennan, Alexander Drew and his wife the former Asst. IG of the CIA Andrea Solomon Drew were found to be edited out of the data hosted on https://qresear.ch.

Wikileaks Vault 7 informed us the CIA had this capability and used it in the 'Who hacked the DNC email-follies.'

1/23/2013 Brennan filed an ethics pledge with the U.S. Senate, “… The purpose of this letter describes the steps I will take to avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest in the event I am confirmed for the position of Director, Central Intelligence Agency…[emphasis added]”48

Six Weeks Later

3/08/2013 Brennan Financial Disclosure form for Director, CIA lists Sotera Defense Solutions 401k (Sotera 401K) valued between $100,001 and $250,000.49 The Sotera 401K is identical in form, function, and composition, with the TAC 401K. By renaming the account Brennan indicates his knowledge of the conflict of interest violation and knowingly attempting to conceal it. In addition, this account had a cash value of over $4 million in 2011 and there is no information Brennan withdrew money from this account.

The preponderance of the evidence in just this two month period indicates Brennan knew the value of his Sotera holdings by meeting with his personal successor at TAC = GTEC = Sotera (Alexander Drew), and Brennan knew his legal responsibilities by meeting with the Assistant Inspector General of the CIA (Mrs. Andrea M. Solomon Drew). Brennan’s meetings with the Drews was set up following the Saudi Intelligence Chief personally warning the President and Brennan of the danger presented by Tsarnaev and held two days later. And a week later Brennan filed his ethics pledge with the U.S. Senate.

Brennan’s history vis-à-vis TTIC, NCTC, TAC and then the White House and the CIA:

It is necessary to understand Brennan’s employment history in this long running scheme to defraud the U.S. Government. Brennan established the TTIC using The Analysis Corporation (TAC) as the foundational indispensable government contractor. Brennan transitioned from Director TTIC to Director NCTC while continuing to employ TAC as the indispensable government contractor.

Brennan retired as Director NCTC on Nov 2, 2005. In a press release written two days prior to his retirement, on Oct 31, 2005, it was announced Brennan would become the next President and CEO of TAC, the indispensable government contractor, on Nov 7, 2005.50

As noted above, TAC provided proprietary software programs and database management to the Department of State and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) since 1990. As the inaugural director of the TTIC at the CIA, Brennan relied upon TAC’s programmatic, and intellectual property, control of watch listing for the State Department and CIA as the foundation of the TTIC’s list of individual terrorists around the world. TAC’s proprietary software and programmatic history in terrorist watch listing made it the indispensable government contractor for tracking terrorists.

At the time Brennan became President and CEO of TAC, TAC was a wholly owned subsidiary of Sachs Freeman Associates, Inc. (SFA, Inc.).51 Brennan arranged the sale of SFA, Inc. and itssubsidiary, TAC, to Global Strategies Group, a UK defense contractor owned by Damian Perl.52 SFA, Inc. was sold to Global Strategies Group for the express purpose of arranging the “spin off” of TAC for an Initial Public Offering (IPO).53 The process of spinning off TAC followed a somewhat convoluted name change process:54

• SFA, Inc. (with TAC) was succeeded by Global Strategies Group (North America), Inc., also known as GNA Holdings,

• TAC was succeeded by Global Technology Strategies, Inc. and SFA, Inc. became a separate company55,

• Global Technology Strategies, Inc. was succeeded by Contego Systems, Inc. with the name Contego NewCo Company, which was

• succeeded by Contego Systems, Inc., which was

• succeeded by Contego Systems, LLC, which was

• succeeded by Global Defense Technology & Systems, Inc. [NASDAQ: GTEC]

• succeeded by Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc. [NASDAQ: GTEC]56

Global Defense Technology & Systems, Inc. was the TAC-successor entity that applied to the Securities and Exchange Commission for an Initial Public Offering (IPO) with stock symbol GTEC.57 Brennan was still President and CEO of TAC, and a Board member of Global Defense Technology & Systems, Inc., when these ownership changes took place.58 During this time frame, Brennan hired his former boss, George Tenet (Director CIA from 1997 to 2004) to a Special Advisory Board at TAC to help capture additional business opportunities through his contacts at the CIA. Tenet’s compensation must have included stock options in the indispensable government contractor.

>>14566043

Sauce

1. https://news.thomasnet.com/companystory/global-strategies-group-and-sfa-inc-combine-forces-508530

53 Global Defense technology & Systems, Inc. Form S-1, dated Sep 3, 2009; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000119312509187027/ds1.htm

54 GLOBAL DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY & SYSTEMS, INC., Amendment No. 4 to Form S-1, Page 4: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000119312509224857/ds1a.htm#toc36942_7

55 https://washingtontechnology.com/Articles/2007/06/22/Technology-with-a-human-touch.aspx

56 Global Defense technology & Systems, Inc. Form S-1, dated Sep 3, 2009; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000119312509187027/ds1.htm57 Ibid.58 Ibid.