Scott Morrison calls on John Howard to lie about why he was sacked from Tourism Australia but the lie doesn’t explain why he was also sacked from Tourism NZ

Scott Morrison was sacked as Managing Director of Tourism Australia in 2006 by the John Howard government and since that time no one would say why. But now John Howard is quoted in the SMH as saying it was a ‘clash of personalities’ with the tourism minister which very much seems like an attempt to neutralize the scandal before the next federal election. This raises more questions than it answers as Morrison also left as the head of Tourism New Zealand in a hurry in 2000 with similar complaints about his performance and conduct.

We will have a look at the SMH article quoting John Howard in a minute but it worth reviewing the article I published in June 2019, which has had over 316,000 views, titled “Looks like PM Scott Morrison was sacked as Managing Director of Tourism Australia in 2006 because of fraud and theft” and I said:

Prime Minister Scott Morrison was sacked as Managing Director of Tourism Australia in 2006 and he has always refused to say why. One thing is for certain, it had to be massive wrongdoing by Morrison. Why? Because Scott Morrison, who was State Director of the New South Wales Liberal Party from 2000 to 2004, was sacked by a Liberal Party Minister in the Liberal Party John Howard government and they don’t sack one of their own for a minor reason or even a major reason. Morrison’s sacking had to be something, at the very least, bordering on criminal and more than likely actual criminal conduct.

Since 2006 Scott Morrison has refused to answer questions about his sacking and little has been known about the reasons for it until now. Journalist Karen Middleton published an article on Saturday (8/6/19) which she spent 6 months investigating and to me it makes it clear Morrison was likely sacked for deliberate lies and deception in relation to the awarding of government contracts worth $184 million.

Karen Middleton writes in The Saturday Paper:

Thirteen years after Scott Morrison was mysteriously sacked from a senior public sector job as managing director of Tourism Australia, a six-month investigation by The Saturday Paper has created the clearest picture yet of the events surrounding his dismissal.

Documents obtained by The Saturday Paper under freedom of information laws show Morrison received a pay rise less than a month before he was sacked, taking his annual base salary from $318,031 to $332,030, with discretion for his employer to add up to 2.5 percent on top.

Around the time of Morrison’s dismissal, it was suggested he was paid out after having his contract terminated more than a year early. Sources have since confirmed this.

It was long speculated that the sacking was the result of a personality clash between Morrison and Bailey or differences over her plans to restructure the agency.

But late last year, The Saturday Paper uncovered an auditor-general’s report from 2008 examining the handling of three major contracts, which had delivered a scathing assessment of Tourism Australia’s management.

The report provided the first indication as to the real reason Morrison was removed.

The contracts were worth $184 million, and the auditor focused most on the two biggest – those with companies M&C Saatchi for global creative services or advertising campaigns, and Carat for media placement.

The audit report revealed that information had been kept from the board, procurement guidelines breached and private companies engaged before paperwork was signed and without appropriate value-for-money assessments.

Both before and since becoming prime minister in August last year, Scott Morrison has refused to answer questions about why the tourism minister took the unusual step in July 2006 of sacking him as head of the agency. He has also refused to answer questions about the handling of the contracts, which were signed the previous year. He did not respond to questions for this story before time of press. (Click here to read the full article)

More

https://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/2021/09/12/scott-morrison-calls-on-john-howard-to-lie-about-why-he-was-sacked-from-tourism-australia-but-the-lie-doesnt-explain-why-he-was-also-sacked-from-tourism-nz/

TaliBANNED: Laura Loomer Has Street Art of Jack Dorsey Plastered All Around Twitter HQ

Laura Loomer has had street art of Jack Dorsey plastered all around Twitter’s headquarters in San Francisco.

The posters feature Dorsey as a member of the Taliban, as they allow them to remain on Twitter while banning conservatives — including Loomer.

The art was designed by Loomer and drawn by Bosch Fawstin, a former Muslim who won the “First Annual Muhammad Art Exhibit and Contest” that was attacked by ISIS in Garland, Texas.

https://youtu.be/g9jScXWr8BQ

“For years, I have been raising awareness about Twitter’s alliance with Islamic terrorist organizations and their willingness to platform enemies of America. This is a concept I have referred to as Silicon Sharia, as Twitter has shown they have no problem banning millions of Americans for their constitutionally protected speech, including myself and sitting President Donald Trump during our elections, while they happily provide a platform for recruitment and propaganda for actual terrorists,” Loomer said in a statement provided to the Gateway Pundit.

“OPERATION TaliBANNED was created to highlight this absurdity and how Big tech tyrants like Jack Dorsey continue to wage digital jihad on free speech in America with widespread bans rooted in the false Left-wing notion that conservatives and Trump supporters are the real terrorists,” Loomer continued. “Twenty years ago, Twitter did not exist, but it would have been unfathomable to every American that someday in America, the leader of one of the most powerful tech companies in the world would aid and avert Islamic terrorists in the digital public sphere. Jack Dorsey has made it clear that thanks to people like him, Americans are less safe than they were 20 years ago.”

Fawstin pointed out that the issue, for him, is not that Twitter bans people — but who they ban and who they don’t.

“The issue with leftist-run tech companies like Twitter is not about whether they have the right to ban people from their platform, it’s about who they consistently target for banning and why, and who they don’t ban, no matter what. They banned a sitting president, Trump, over the lie that he was the leader of an ‘insurrection’, which the FBI now admits there was no proof of,” Fawstin said.

Fawstin said that Twitter acts “in full accordance with Shariah blasphemy laws” by banning critics of Islam from the platform.

“Twitter bans Islam critics like me and Laura, acting in full accordance with shariah blasphemy laws, while allowing Islamic terrorists who murder Americans to spread their propaganda on their platform. That’s evil, whether or not they have the technical ‘right’ to ban whomever they want. And I do wonder that if our government ever were to officially declare war on the Islamic terrorist enemy, if this aiding and abetting of an enemy in a time of war that Twitter engages in would be legally recognized as such.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/talibanned-laura-loomer-street-art-jack-dorsey-plastered-around-twitter-hq-videos/

Projection

Former CIA director warns botched Afghanistan withdrawal could pave way for Al Qaeda attacks on US soil

Leon Panetta, who served as CIA director and Defense secretary in the Obama administration, warned Sunday that Al Qaeda could launch future attacks on American soil because the Taliban again control Afghanistan.

What did Panetta say?

Speaking with Greta Van Susteren, Panetta said the Taliban that re-took control of Afghanistan "is pretty much the same Taliban that controlled Afghanistan on 9/11," which means Al Qaeda will likely reorganize under the protection of the Taliban.

"I just see terrorism becoming a renewed threat to the United States, and I'm not sure that you can get a lot done when you're dealing essentially with an adversary whose primary interest, the primary interest of terrorists, is to attack Americans and kill Americans," Panetta said.

In fact, Panetta explained he has zero doubts Al Qaeda will exploit the botched U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Taliban takeover to launch future attacks against America.

"There was a recent interview by one of the spokesman for the Taliban, where he was asked about bin Laden's role in 9/11, and he had the gall to say that he has not seen any evidence that [Osama] bin Laden was involved in the 9/11 attack," Panetta said. "And if that is the case, then it's clear to me that they're going to continue to support Al Qaeda, and allow Al Qaeda to basically continue to develop and expand. And I think they will plan additional attacks on our country, as well as elsewhere."

Later in the interview, Panetta described the "rapid-fire withdrawal" from Afghanistan, which was orchestrated by President Joe Biden, as a "mistake."

"What we missed was understanding the kind of consequences that developed and protecting ourselves from those consequences," Panetta said.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/leon-panetta-future-al-aqeda-attacks

AUSTRALIA: Law Firm Takes On COVID Tyrants, Fighting To End Vaccine Mandates

"No jab, no job, no COVID-19 vaccination, NO WAY"

National File previously reported that the Australian Supreme Court in New South Wales is hearing various cases against mandatory vaccinations as the Australian people face some of the most dystopian and authoritarian coronavirus pandemic measures the world has ever seen.

One Australian law firm known as G&B Lawyers is leading the charge for medical freedom.

National File previously reported that the NSW Supreme Court in Australia is currently facing several lawsuits aimed at ending the enforcement of mandatory vaccinations across the land.

As was reported by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, “More than 50,000 people have watched a Sydney court’s live stream of cases challenging the legality of mandated COVID vaccinations for NSW workers. Three of the four civil cases are against Health Minister Brad Hazzard and raise varying legal approaches, including constitutional arguments.”

Nathan Buckley, the promoter of the “No jab, no job, no COVID-19 vaccination, NO WAY” campaign, is a lawyer and Partner of G&B Lawyers – a Sydney city based law firm that believes in the protection of fundamental freedoms for Australians and is gearing up to challenge the vaccine mandates at the High Court.

“Enough is enough. It’s time to tell the Government NO WAY to the no jab no job laws that have been introduced. If you have been fired from your job for not having a flu shot, or refused entry into an aged care facility for not providing proof that you have had a flu shot, then this fundraiser is there to protect your civil rights,” reads a statement on the G&B Lawyers website.

The anti-vaccine mandate fundraiser has risen over $400,000 as citizens across the country seek to restore their medical freedoms. “Our goal is to have these draconian laws thrown out, so we can all return to some level of normality,” Mr. Buckley told National File. (SEE MORE: Australian Nightmare: Police Launch COVID Manhunt For Citizen Who Coughed In Elevator, Dub Him ‘Public Health Enemy No. 1’)

“The contributions that people put forward will support your fellow Australians who choose not to have a flu vaccination or COVID-19 vaccination, to gain justice, help those Australians to get on with their lives and return to normal as quickly as possible. It will protect all Australians’ fundamental right to choose whether or not to have a flu vaccination or COVID-19 vaccination. Like all Australians, I will forever be grateful to all contributors who free Australia from the draconian and unlawful laws that have already been introduced by State and Commonwealth Governments in recent months.”

https://nationalfile.com/australia-law-firm-takes-on-covid-tyrants-fighting-to-end-vaccine-mandates/