Anons theorizes one-to-two days from now, which will be 10:[57] & 10:[58] Qclock timse, could be the "11.3 Marker" (well, one of a few, Kevin would argue).

Yesterday was 10:[55]pm (both clock hands essentially on 11), [55] is AT 11 on a clock, plus [03] = "11.3 Marker" at 11:58, Sept 15? It is 2 minutes shy of 11:00pm Qclock time.

Perhaps straddling [57] and [58] offers the best of both worlds, in that [57] is minus [03] from 11:00pm precisely.

Or the Qclock is just the biggest damned wasted of time this anon has committed to in this particular one thirteenth of anon's life. Now… imagine a QClock image posted here with many arrows, circles and drops looking vaguely like a sign of intelligent life. Kek.

Oh wait, maybe there's a YT video with a related thumbnail… meh… close.

>>14569681

Oh, and 9/15 just happens to fit nicely with the title of a book this guy wrote.

Incidentally, that prior video is actually emotionally stirring—had forgotten how good that SOTU speech was. I'm not easily moved to tears, and this video is no exception, but it doesn't fall far short of the goal.

Minute 17

WTW

>>14569789

>>14569797

Very nice connections.

Now my question becomes, "Today is '2 days ahead of [that] schedule'"

2644

Jan 05, 2019 12:45:01 PM EST

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: f71f75 No. 4609878

1.7.18.jpg

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1081579754191552514

(2 DAYS AHEAD of schedule)

Q

2y, 8m, 1w, 18h, 45m ago

1.7.18 might be written as "1718" which converts to "56" as 24-hour clock times, which happen to be where we are [56] today.

>>14569903

so it do

https://www.gematrix.org/?word=week+of