Anonymous ID: 0425ba Sept. 14, 2021, 3:38 p.m. No.14581411   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1440

>>14581376

Censoring is 'playing the victim'.

 

To censor information is to portray oneself as a victim of information so harmful it cannot even enter the censor's eyes (let alone anyone else's eyes).

 

If the BV wants to post about a race or religion, I say go right ahead because this is a free speech board, just don't censor anons because that contradicts free speech.

Anonymous ID: 0425ba Sept. 14, 2021, 3:56 p.m. No.14581514   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14581500

>These changes have been introduced because of concerns with the prescribing of oral ivermectin for the claimed prevention or treatment of COVID-19. Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in other developed countries, and its use by the general public for COVID-19 is currently strongly discouraged by the National COVID Clinical Evidence Taskforce, the World Health Organisation and the US Food and Drug Administration.

So medical tyranny because of anti-science 'concerns' from corrupt 'health' organizations.

Gotcha.

Anonymous ID: 0425ba Sept. 14, 2021, 4:06 p.m. No.14581565   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1567 >>1568 >>1700

>>14581538

Is that what you feel basic logic is? A "mind game"? Here, let me help you:

 

A is pro-X

B is pro-X

Ergo, B is like A with respect to X.

 

Nazis were pro censorship.

Mr. Smith is pro censorship.

Ergo, Mt. Smith is like the Nazis with respect to censorship.

 

Mind games? This is what you would see on cognitive tests for mental impairment.

 

Is basic logic really that difficult for you?