>>14584267
>The problem with Q in that respects is Q was dead set against violence
That's not a problem.
If you think violence will solve anything, then you are out of your mind.
Who do you want to go violent against?
Hang a few politicians?
They are puppets, and the handlers won't care.
Instead they will use that to introduce even more control and take away guns and whatnot.
burn supermarkets down?
What will that accomplish? Nothing.
Don't support companies that force you to wear masks and other nonsense. That's an actual election, you choose which companies you want to do business with.
Screaming about it, but still complying and buying their will not solve shit.
You would also act like the retarded marxist left.
You are playing into their hands with violence.
What does a (good, most good) police officer do when:
will the police officer support them, or go against them?
That's not saying that you can't or should not defend yourself in case violence hits you. But if you start violence, it's playing into their hands. Playbook. They want riots and chaos. Don't give it to them.
Simply don't support them any longer.
No Amazon purchases.
No Netflix.
No cable subscription.
No supermarket chain purchases
Buy locally from farmers.
Fuck their fake system.
Good choices.