>>14584354

>Q […] ultimately insisted that the work was upon us…

Then why the ongoing refrain about "military is the only way"? Did that not come from Q? Does it not contradict the message you laid out?

And speaking of "military is the only way", now that we've seen the brass betray the Republic, the Constitution, soldiers, and civilians during the Afghanistan debacle, and we've even got Milley allegedly guilty of treason (though he'll most certainly be allowed to skate), how is it that anons continue to believe that "military is the only way" without their brains exploding from cog diss overload?

I was just listening to X22 today, and Dave is STILL pushing "military the only way" even as he analyzes the Milley disclosure. I don't get it. Not trying to be blackpillish. Honestly stumped.

>>14584525

>Common sense says Biden's playing his part.

Commoner sense would say that Bidan doesn't even know what state he's in half the time and was hustled into that scenario by handlers. Less common sense might lead one into Looking Glass speculations. I definitely do not subscribe to any notion that Bidan is in any way /ourguy/.

Besides which, my point still stands about the contradictions between "we the people do it ourselves at the precipice" and "military is the only way" and, now, "military is comped". Are we banking on White Hats in the military now? If so, who are they, and why did they allow those young soldiers to be sacrificed in Afghanistan? And the thousands of others stranded? I understand and accept that casualties are inevitable in war, but wasn't it enough to show the world the corruption in the brass ranks that they handed infrastructure and cash to the enemy on a silver platter, and basically acted like they were following orders from Beijing? I have questions, in lurking here way moar than usual in the last week or so, I haven't seen proposed answers. Anyway, back to memefagging.

o7

>>14584582

>By calling in the military and having them as a continual presence, they put the cabal on notice.

I appreciate your non-sarcastic answer. But if the military leadership is comped, how does it follow that the military will "put on notice" the cabal that has comped it and which it now serves? I wrote this in another post: is there the idea that white hat generals are waiting in the wings? Thank you again and o7.

(Video related.)

>>14584646

>US mil leadership was comped by the dnccp. It is the dnccp they serve directly. The cabal indirectly.

Thanks, but isn't this splitting hairs? It doesn't answer the question. Why would the a comped military "keep public order" for patriots while they go about restoring the Republic? Does not compute.

>>14584628

>sitting around doing nothing isn't solving shit either.

Truest statement I've seen on this board in quite some time.

I haven't given up all semblance of hope, but I do have many days that are pic-related.

>>14584714

>>14584661

>>14584771

>>14584704

>>14584666

>>14584582

>>14584628

Thanks anons for the straightforward discussion.

I have seen it claimed that when the bolsheviks were taking over and destroying Imperial Russia, there was a "Q-like" tactic employed to reassure the people that the military would step in and save the day. Obviously that didn't happen. When I think of all the technocratic means these demons we are up against now have at their disposal, it makes the bolsheviks look like boy scouts.

I see virtually no possibility that the common core educated rank and file will rebel. A lot of them have been brainwashed with the wokist propaganda and are only in uniform because they didn't know what else to do, or had no other choice, or because, like that delightful young dyke whose tiktok vid I posted earlier, they're psychos who actually relish the idea of killing conservative Americans on home soil.

As for Iron Eagles, we all saw what happened to one colonel who spoke out against all the corruption, but didn't even go so far as to call it that, complaining that it was mere incompetence.

I've never served in the military, and don't know much about it, but the observations and data points are there. "Military is the only way" doesn't sit well with this anon at all.