>>14584514 pb
>>Then why the ongoing refrain about "military is the only way"?
Put together “military is the only way” & “watch the wives”, differentiate between civilian court & Military court.
The venue that prosecutes for treason & crimes against humanity?
MSM ability to impact the outcome via gaslighting public opinion?
>>And speaking of "military is the only way", now that we've seen the brass betray the Republic, the Constitution, soldiers, and civilians during the Afghanistan debacle
That’s a quite a statement, an uninformed /misinformed one. You’ve seen what you’ve been shown by folks w/ hidden agendas & filled the gaps w/ poor assumptions.
>>‘military… betray… civilians in Afghanistan’
The chain of command ends at civilian leadership. It may be some “brass” failed in pointing out negative consequences, lacked foresight or did see & voice objections & were ignored. Unless a direct order is illegal it is followed. The order would not have been ‘abandon civilians’ or similar. More likely the order would be along the lines of ‘deploy to a different area’ & may have included force protection as a reason post bombing. This would be a legal order followed regardless of opinion. This closely followed by MSM + claims that the Military “abandoned civilians” in Afghanistan w/ no mention of orders given by civilian leadership. Coincidence?
The point of the ‘Military betrayed…’ bullshit is gaslighting the public so they distrust the Military.
Who gains? Traitors & those guilty of crimes against humanity aware their arrest & trial in Military court is imminent. Predictive (television) programming similar w/ ‘the fires were just to hot’ being spewed across MSM immediately following WTC 1 & 2 “collapse”.
Coincidence WTC 7 very rarely, if ever, mentioned in any of the many television programs aired every 9/11?