To the Anons who would prefer not see Corsi (and similar) on the board…

This is your/our nerve center. All mentions of the Q phenomenon from outlets or 'characters' with a decent reach can provide very important information about the opposition.

One should always be interested & alert to what detractors are saying. We can glean motives from tweets, videos, editorials, etc & continue to determine to whom people may be beholden.

The more Corsi says, the better. We will monitor his efforts until, at minimum, until he ceases the attack. For good measure, surveillance will actually continue well beyond his last mention of Q and even Trump.

People who's livelihoods are dependant on appealing to the public wouldn't continue to vilify a movement if it was financially detrimental. Clearly Corsi is losing followers, ergo money…

…So WHO IS MAKING UP THE DIFFERENCE?

>>That's what we want to know

Someone is supplementing what's being lost & THEN SOME. Otherwise he would have just continued being a Q-tuber. Patriots don't risk their reputation for no gain. His is financial.

>>We will dig into who's sending the checks, what's their end game & who's in that same network. Bear with us during this process.

All evidence is worth "filing" but not all evidence is worth commenting upon

To quell anon exacerbation, I suggest ONE RESPONDENT simply say "Thanks" or "Noted" after a screencap of a tweet is posted. It need not change the conversation or get mad replies if its from the "usual suspects".

The point is to add it to the repository for continued discernment & counter moves necessary if any. Let's LET IT BE after that unless the content is rather notable.

This helps us to determine EVERYONE'S motives. Jones, John Legend, Snoop Dog, et al. Influencers must always be watched. The second we forget is the day we pay dearly.