>Q is fake after January 05th
Their evidence is weak at best and pathetic at worse…
How do all these naysayers explain the sequence of events that occurred at the end of January outlined in this graphic?
I think we can ALL agree that calling out the FBI with such an OMINOUS threat takes BALLS. But then for the FBI to actually concede to Q's threat a couple of days later and reverse direction seems like pretty strong evidence to me that they took Q's threat seriously as opposed to it just being a "coincidence."
I will always be open minded to critical analysis, but I have yet to see any credible evidence that Q is compromised.