>>14618661 PB FDA adverse events covid "vaccine"
>In Feb 2021 a group called Doctors for Covid Ethics sent an open letter describing concerns about the vaccine. explained perceived risks and asked covid vaccine manufacturers address them. Their views were percipient as it turns out.
>Concerns:
>CONCERNS (Confirming references included at link) evidence needed the following issues were evaluated and excluded as risks by vaccine manufacturers:
>- 1. Following intramuscular injection …gene-based vaccines will reach the bloodstream and disseminate throughout the body
>-2. vaccines will remain entrapped in the circulation and be taken up by endothelial cells… particularly at sites of slow blood flow, i.e. in small vessels and capillaries
>-3. during expression of the vaccines’ nucleic acids, peptides derived from the spike protein will be presented via the MHC I* — pathway at the luminal surface of the cells. Many healthy individuals have CD8-lymphocytes that recognize such peptides, which may be due to prior COVID infection, but also to cross-reactions with other types of Coronavirus…that these lymphocytes will mount an attack on the respective cells.
>-4. endothelial damage with subsequent triggering of blood coagulation via platelet activation will ensue at countless sites throughout the body.
>-5 this will lead to a drop in platelet counts, …and to myriad ischaemic lesions throughout the body including in the brain, spinal cord and heart. Bleeding disorders might occur in the wake of this novel type of DIC-syndrome including, amongst other possibilities, profuse bleedings and haemorrhagic stroke.
>-6 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor on platelets, which results in their activation…
> . Thrombocytopenia has been reported in severe cases of SARSCoV-2 infection & thrombocytopenia has also been reported in vaccinated individuals…platelet activation that would also lead to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)
>ISSUE
>- by the time of consideration for approval of the vaccines, the health systems of most countries were no longer under imminent threat of being overwhelmed because a growing proportion of the world had already been infected and the worst of the pandemic had already abated.
>- authors demand conclusive evidence that an actual emergency existed at the time of the EMA granting Conditional Marketing Authorisation to the manufacturers of all three vaccines, to justify their approval for use in humans by the EMA, purportedly because of such an emergency.
>DEMAND
>Should all such evidence not be available, we demand that approval for use of the gene-based vaccines be withdrawn until all the above issues have been properly addressed by the exercise of due diligence by the EMA.
>SIGNIFICANCE
>There are serious concerns, including but not confined to those outlined above, that the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless, and that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute “human experimentation”, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.
>Doc signatures included after references at link.
>https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/urgent-open-letter-from-doctors-and-scientists-to-the-european-medicines-agency-regarding-covid-19-f6e17c311595