So I was riding to work this morning listening to music and contemplating everything we see going on and this song came on.
Is this what it looks like in plaid?
Asking for a friend.
>Define "Good"
Well, as that song was playing I watched a car run from the police. (2 were behind; few more trailing further back)
As I continued down the road it dawned on me that the rest of the traffic (Majority) were +/- the speed limit but essentially within the law. Most people are good while there is a small few that create chaos.
>So the majority followed a rule that sometimes makes sense, sometimes doesn't make sense, and that makes them good?
If by agreement they established the rule was 'good' by their definition, yes.
>Let's say a girl is getting raped and you witness it. Are you good just because you don't rape girls?
In my humble opinion, yes. If again… by agreement we as a society believe raping a child is 'bad' then stopping the act would be classified as 'good'.
>What are you when you let such a crime happen without doing anything?
Personally I'd feel like a terrible human inside, but that's not everyone. Good question though.
>Let's go back to a bully. Most people aren't bullies. Bullies create chaos, also create psychological damage, sometimes beyond repair. Almost no one stops them. Why?
My answer would be Fear. Fear of being wrong, fear of getting hurt… fear of losing.
>Is a teacher good when that teacher doesn't do shit?
My definition of a good teacher is one that understands what a student needs and tailors the lesson to the students needs as best the teacher can understand and relate.
>But when the victim strikes back with force and you might say that this creates even more chaos, which is kinda true, but I can't really blame the victim for that - then these exact same people at the very least pretend to care.
This is a bit murky. Personally speaking, not sure that I could blame a 'victim' for creating more chaos, however, the end result is… more chaos.
>Is that what you define as good?
I defined 'good' in the first question as well as not fully understanding the point of the above question. Would need further clarification of what you're asking in the above.
>If so, then that's a really weird definition.
Enh, LIFE is strange sometimes. Live, learn and let sleeping dogs lie I suppose.
Thanks for the conversation this morning Anon. cya round
>Whatcha doing with your TIME, Mr. Cool?
Thinking I'll get back to work Anon. Too much time spent playing silly games.
Bye now. :-*
>Historic tree is going to burn down
>Gov: I know what to do….. let's make a baked potato
>Who is making money off this?
Guess it depends on what you value Anon. Perspectives n' all dat.
>Funny thing is 60-70% believe the election was stolen including 40% of dems. Someone keeps on saying 80% have to get on board before this happens. I kind of believe it
>Herd immunity occurs when a large portion of a community (the herd) becomes immune to a disease, making the spread of disease from person to person unlikely. As a result, the whole community becomes protected — not just those who are immune.
Translated:
Herd immunity occurs when a large portion of a community (the herd) can see through the bullshit, making it more unlikely the people believe the lies. As a result, the whole community becomes protected — not just those who are immune.
Would imagine that's the point of using our God Given right of Freedom of speech.
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/bill-of-rights/what-does-it-say
Welp, Good Game Fellas