Anonymous ID: 6ffec5 Sept. 20, 2021, 5:59 a.m. No.14621674   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1689 >>1847

>>14621658

Define "Good"

Good sheeps, following orders whatever these orders cause, at the same time not wanting to be responsible for any of it?

Is a medical doctor good, when the doctor acts ignorant and ignores claims of "anti-vaxxers"?

An actual expert would look it up, at the very least to shut the anti-vaxxer down, but they don't do that.

What about bullies? Good?

How maby people actually care when a bully victim commits suicide?

Nobody gives a shit?

Good?

But when the bully victim strikes back with force (opposite reaction than suicide), then everyone cries?

Is that good?

It's sick.

Anonymous ID: 6ffec5 Sept. 20, 2021, 6:10 a.m. No.14621726   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1783

>>14621689

So the majority followed a rule that sometimes makes sense, sometimes doesn't make sense, and that makes them good?

 

Let's say a girl is getting raped and you witness it. Are you good just because you don't rape girls? What are you when you let such a crime happen without doing anything?

 

Let's go back to a bully. Most people aren't bullies. Bullies create chaos, also create psychological damage, sometimes beyond repair. Almost no one stops them. Why?

Is a teacher good when that teacher doesn't do shit?

 

But when the victim strikes back with force and you might say that this creates even more chaos, which is kinda true, but I can't really blame the victim for that - then these exact same people at the very least pretend to care.

Is that what you define as good?

If so, then that's a really weird definition.