>>1462973
It's possible. What would be the use?
It would be speculation? Webb says Bannon.
And I agree. I don't know all the characters. But Bannon makes sense. He turned on President Trump. It wasn't an act, IMO. And before that Bannon had pretended friendship and watched all the goings on in the White House. That betrayal must've been very harsh on President Trump? Wasn't Bannon in on the Wolff book? The man who wrote the disrespectful lying book, which was over the top fiction?
And then Bannon tried to insinuate himself back again, into the Trump supporter clan. That's way stupid.
Bannon was too harsh. He joined the hate crowd. Why would he do that if he was loyal? He wouldn't. He wouldn't be able to act that snark unless it were real. Horrible. So shallow and vicious.
I don't know anything, but that. Naturally there were a lot of snakes in the grass around President Trump when he first entered there. Who knows who was THE leaker. I thought there was more than one?
It's been rough. The hate has just been over-the-top. Is it possible to leave that behind now that we are on to better times?
>>1463137
If Stone is "AJ"'s handler [rather than Booth] that would explain why "Q" would be a threat to Stone and therefore to all of them?
The jealously toward Q is mind-boggling. It wasn't feigned. I would never have expected it. But I saw it I really learned something. Wow.
P.S. why don't you catch up on "Alex Jones" Or is it that you just don't want to know?