Anonymous ID: 43cce3 Sept. 23, 2021, 1:39 p.m. No.14645214   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5223 >>5229 >>5236 >>5247

PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021

BEDMINSTER, NJ

 

Letter to Texas Governor Greg Abbott

 

Dear Governor Abbott,

 

Despite my big win in Texas, I hear Texans want an election audit! You know your fellow Texans have big questions about the November 2020 Election. Bills to audit elections in your great state's House and Senate were considered during Texas' Second Special Session. Instead, the legislature passed a watered-down amendment that doesn’t even apply to the 2020 Presidential Election. This short amendment doesn't answer the questions Texans have about the last election. Texans demand a real audit to completely address their concerns.

 

We need HB 16, which was just filed in the Third Special Session. This legislation specifically addresses the 2020 Presidential Election, and enables audits for future elections. The bill creates a process for candidates and party chairs to initiate an audit, and uses the same language as SB 97, which already passed the Texas State Senate, but did not have enough time to make it through the House during the Second Special Session.

 

Texas needs you to act now. Your Third Special Session is the perfect, and maybe last, opportunity to pass this audit bill. Time is running out. Paper ballots in your state are only kept for 22 months after the election. Your citizens don’t trust the election system, and they want your leadership on this issue, which is the number one thing they care about. It is their most important issue—one that will affect 2022 and 2024.

 

Governor Abbott, we need a "Forensic Audit of the 2020 Election" added to the call. We're quickly running out of time and it must be done this week. Texans know voting fraud occurred in some of their counties. Let's get to the bottom of the 2020 Presidential Election Scam!

 

Donald J. Trump

 

https://t.me/LizHarrington76/1335

Anonymous ID: 43cce3 Sept. 23, 2021, 1:46 p.m. No.14645245   🗄️.is 🔗kun

ICYMI: "U.S. touts new project to bolster Tajik-Afghan border, as Biden abandons U.S. border wall"

 

"Do you believe this? Crazy!" - President Donald J. Trump

 

https://justthenews.com/government/security/biden-halts-us-border-wall-helps-former-soviet-republic-stop-afghan-refugees

 

https://t.me/LizHarrington76/1339

Anonymous ID: 43cce3 Sept. 23, 2021, 1:47 p.m. No.14645248   🗄️.is 🔗kun

ICYMI: "Youngkin leads McAuliffe among likely voters: poll"

 

"Terry McAuliffe was a badly failed Governor—owned by Crooked Hillary." - President Donald J. Trump

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/573497-youngkin-leads-mcauliffe-among-likely-voters-poll

 

https://t.me/LizHarrington76/1340

Anonymous ID: 43cce3 Sept. 23, 2021, 1:49 p.m. No.14645263   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Gen Flynn

, [23.09.21 16:21]

Highly respected attorney, Matt DePerno (Michigan candidate for Attorney General), issues a legal opinion explaining how states can #Decertify their elections & counters the AZ Senate lawyer (Ken Behringer) who recently sent an opinion stating there is no mechanism to decertify.

 

If there are ANY elements of fraud, the legislature has a constitutional duty to DECERTIFY!

 

@RealGenFlynn, [23.09.21 16:22]

https://wendyrogers.org/attorney-matt-deperno-responds-to-az-senate-lawyer-who-claimed-senate-could-not-decertify/

 

Attorney Matt Deperno Responds To Az Senate Lawyer Who Claimed Senate Could Not Decertify

 

The following is a legal opinion submitted to Sen. Wendy Rogers by attorney Matt DePerno, in response to the opinion published by the Arizona Senate lawyer who incorrectly declared that the Senate could not decertify the election.

 

“In light of the Behringer Memo, we ask again whether a State Legislature can recall the state electors or decertify a national election upon proof of fraud in the election? After again considering the constitutional authority of the State Legislature, the Constitution itself, and U.S. Supreme Court authority and precedent, the answer is definitively ‘Yes.’“

 

“States have authority over their elections, including national elections. ‘Congress has never undertaken to interfere with the manner of appointing electors, or, where (according to the new general usage) the mode of appointment prescribed by the law of the State is election by the people, to regulate the conduct of such election, or to punish any fraud in voting for electors; but has left these matters to the control of the States.‘ In re Green, 134 U.S. 377, 380 (1890) (emphasis added).”

 

Read the full memo: