Anon opines.
The question of why Trump would knowingly endorse the vax if he’s really on our side keeps coming up from anons and shills alike.
Q asked us what would have happened if POTUS (45) challenged the COVID narrative from the beginning. Instant media assault, a major setback for the movement in terms of breaking the spell of the media.
POTUS was ‘forced’ to play to the narrative. Think CHESS, think tactical retreats.
In Chess you make sacrifices in order to win. Some are thinking, why would he sacrifice innocent lives?
He’s not, he’s sacrificing OPTICS. The enemy are the ones who made the vaccine and are pushing it through media narrative. They are responsible for the deaths and injuries from the vaccines and COVID.
So POTUS made an OPTICS sacrifice. But in chess sacrifices often serve the purpose of drawing the opponent into the [kill box]. Just like with all of the other components being forced to expose themselves through their actions (DARK TO LIGHT), the vaccine issue has been pushed to the forefront. Where before it was the anti-vax crowd fighting mandates in California, it’s now worldwide AND tied to lockdowns, economic destruction, etc.
So again, chess. Is it a wise move for POTUS to openly challenge the narrative on vaccines, thereby sacrificing the King (CHECKMATE), or to make a tactical sacrifice of optics in order to counter-trap the opponent into further exposing themselves? The enemy is destroying themselves.
The other component is Q’s mantra: THINK FOR YOURSELF.
Trump doesn’t want a cult of personality around him. The optics sacrifice works on multiple levels. One of those levels creates a sort of distrust of Trump himself for those who take him at his word without question. If he’s pushing the vaccine he must be bad, right? It means that more people aren’t blindly following him just because he said it. THINK FOR YOURSELF.