Q Research General #18538: Saving The World Edition
Not sure mortal men and women can do that. But it's worth the fight.
>brave
Brave? How brave are you when you have army of robot hit men deep state cocksuckers willing to pull a trigger for money. Actually one one one these two guys are pathetic and weak. I could prove it to you but Brennan and Clapper won't fight me one on one. I can come up with 20 dollar words like Brennan. + the guys that shoot for them probable think just like me. They don't like them either.
This is getting rolled out in slow methodical fashion. Not what the internet culture is used too. But it is a form of record and documentation. Who knew it was a tandem bicycle.
The closer it gets to testifying under oath the more pressure builds. The last resort is to KILL corroborating witnesses. The FBI knows all about it.
Anything is possible now. Same as it ever was. The key is to key to the top of the hill. Then let it roll.
Hey I check out the real raw news controversy. Guess what. Satire is protected by the 1st amendment. And incredibly strongly and persistently protected. Not only that satire is protected against libel. Another words if you satirically mention a person by individual name as has been done in RRN you are protected.
This was a surprise. Especially when looking at social media and banning. But now makes sense. This goes back to the 1800's where newspaper cartoons did this everyday.
So what we have here with RRN is 1. a satirical website 2. an ingenious method of conveying information under the guise of satire.
Why is satire protected speech?
In particular, satire provides a form for individuals to criticize government, thus enhancing public rhetoric. When it is aimed at political issues, it can be construed as political speech, which is the most protected form of speech under the First Amendment.
Protecting Satire Against Libel Claims: A
New Reading of the First Amendment's
Opinion Privilege
https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7214&context=ylj