I have a serious question. We have politicians practicing medicine and we have non-physicians and nurses regularly given the go-ahead to administer pharmaceuticals. We also have pharmacists practicing medicine by choosing which medications to provide when a doctor prescribes. Now I am reading that the New York governor is allowing non-medically trained personnel to staff New York hospitals when trained staff quit due to vaccine mandates.

In this context why should any trained physician or nurse fear loss of their medical license? Why can't they just practice privately, which is as it should be in any case. An individual with credentials or not puts out their "shingle" and people choose to pay for the services or not. Caveat emptor.

>>14664819

Reminds me of a prophetic moment I had with one of my offspring years ago. Based on something said I realized we are headed to a world with no schools, no police and no roads (think on it). To be clear it is a good place. Like the garden of Eden.

>>14664843

Perhaps we should do as they do and not as they say. What I mean by this is that if a governor or some such can practice medicine why can't godly doctors who are getting "exited" for not taking the wax set up shop and treat people without their "license". It is obviously not necessary. Hospital administrators (and the momentarily hidden entities "above" them) are writing treatment protocols and overruling treating physicians. There is no grounds to arrest or prosecute someone saving a life in a private transaction. Caveat emptor, of course.

>>14664849

>a world reborn anew with the evil removed from the reins of power.

Amen to that.

>>14664852

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2215535.Nerds

Perhaps you should get a life and pick up a book.

Bill Gates was a nerd. We need some on our side, too.

>>14664624

Notable dig, imo.