Anonymous ID: d8d4e3 Sept. 26, 2021, 5:58 p.m. No.14668619   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8652 >>8662

Which is why Q flourished

He said things which logically COULD have been true

And people immediately believed them as provably true

Without that whole, ya know, proof thing

And now the powers that be know the gullibility of the average internet denizen

And your world will never be even an approximation of reality ever again

That's how "pilot studies" are designed

Anonymous ID: d8d4e3 Sept. 26, 2021, 6:08 p.m. No.14668723   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Both sides of a rhetorical debate are logically accurate

Only one or possibly nether are actually true

As I said, the internet no longer understands the difference between "could be true" and "is true" and this is an exploit the powers that be will use for the rest of your lives

Anonymous ID: d8d4e3 Sept. 26, 2021, 6:27 p.m. No.14668861   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8869

>>14668848

>team darkside

Chaotic Neutral

Just doing a pilot study on irrelevant internet people

Will now publish the results in a military journal and go about their next study

>These people are stupid

Anonymous ID: d8d4e3 Sept. 26, 2021, 6:30 p.m. No.14668880   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8891

>>14668869

That's totally true

What's that saying? Virtue untested is not virtue at all?

We are the technically un-comped because no one would bother attempting to comp us

That's not a virtuous thing, that's just a circumstance thing