It's obvious a bunch of these "alternative media" types are tools, and that now they've gotten their numbers called, and are on full-court-press against Q. I followed George Webb for a long time (until the Memphis Maersk fiasco)– now, checking in on what's he's up to, I see he has "discovered" that "Sessions is a U1 conspirator", and probably Flynn too… Oh the muddy waters!
So much disinformation. But now they are all going for broke and attacking Q… So we're near the critical point…
REMINDER:
Making this board seem cultish is a current tactic of the co-optation shills:
Worshipping Q
Mindlessly salivating over Q
Expressing desperately excessive fixation on the letter "Q"
etc.
Discrediting tactics, to make us look bad.
Be aware anons.
You have no reason to assume that is anons, and not intentional discrediting.
We should ALWAYS assume that apparently organic anon posts that make the board look bad or foolish (in the huge variety of ways this happens) are likely not real, and on fact intentional efforts at discrediting. We should assume this because we KNOW they won't stop trying to discredit, and because we KNOW that AI can sniff out and execute such posts in endless profusion.
If you don't see it happening, then don't worry about it. Just be alert to the possibility.
You obviously agree that all the efforts of the enemies of freedom are going tio be focused on this board. Therefore, it is certainly reasonable– and indeed necessary– that we promote awareness of their tactics and potential tactics, and remain vigilant in recognizing and punting them out as they occur.
Certainly a sincere and thoughtful anon would not dismiss that with trite jargon like "concernfag".
Indeed, such "chan" tropes are precisely the sort of thing AI would tend to exploit- wouldn't you agree?
One thing we know, thanks to CDAN, is that Merkle is more or less a whore, or was. So it certainly seems like this is a questionable choice for royalty. Kek
Naturally. And you're very eager to express your racism, right? Because that is the level you're at– simple, crude, unthinking… That is how the board is portrayed, and your racism is important enough to you that you find a need to state it over and over in the simplest terms.. Would you agree with that?
And it's extremely important to make that a top priority of Q research, right? Even if it drives away normies in droves.
It is an unfortunate compromise that we have to prioritize scholarly racism such as you profess over presenting Q in a way to maximize connection with the masses. Very unfortunate. But prioritize we must, so let's express our racism, over and over… Because it is the top priority…
It's really very obvious how fake it is.