Anonymous ID: 1b80e2 Sept. 27, 2021, 6:23 a.m. No.14671515   🗄️.is 🔗kun

As Americans spend, credit card debt is ticking back up

 

NEW YORK, Sept 27 (Reuters) - Early in the pandemic, there were encouraging and surprising signs about the decline of credit card debt.

 

Now, that trendline seems to be changing.

 

Many Americans stayed at home at the start of COVID-19 and did not spend like they usually do. They also received several rounds of emergency cash assistance, helping to chop away at those credit-card bills, at least temporarily.

 

Spending is ticking back up – and the results are starting to show up on our monthly statements.

 

In fact, 42% of those with credit card debt, or 59 million Americans, say they have added to their balances since the beginning of the pandemic, according to a new study by personal finance site Bankrate.com.

 

"Things are better for some, but they are not better for everybody," explains Ted Rossman, Bankrate’s senior industry analyst.

 

The end of stimulus checks, expanded unemployment benefits and the eviction moratorium does not bode well for debt management, Rossman added.

 

This trend reversal is reflected in the most recent numbers of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Its Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit found that credit-card bills rose by$17billion in 2021’s second quarter, to $790 billion nationally. That was the first uptick after four straight quarters of declines.

 

Also headed north were auto loans, by$33billion in the quarter, and mortgage debt, by $282 billion. All told it makes for total household debt of $14.96 trillion, a quarterly rise of 2.1%.

 

more

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/americans-spend-credit-card-debt-040000728.html

Anonymous ID: 1b80e2 Sept. 27, 2021, 6:25 a.m. No.14671529   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Federal authorities cash in on safety box seizures as owners fight back

 

Pearsons works at a nonprofit theater in Los Angeles, and Store is a transportation coordinator in the film industry. The couple has been saving for retirement for years, buying silver here and there when they could afford it. To keep their property safe, they rented a safe deposit box at U.S. Private Vaults.

 

They thought everything was above board until news broke earlier this year about a raid at the Beverly Hills business.

 

The government alleged that the company conspired with customers to sell drugs, launder money, and stash ill-gotten goods.

 

Armed with a warrant, FBI and Drug Enforcement Administration agents spent five days ripping several hundred safety deposit boxes out of the walls and laying claim to its contents.

 

Prosecutors argued they were within their rights and that the boxes contained weapons and drugs. They also took jewelry, precious metals, and stacks of money to an undisclosed warehouse. Their final haul was worth around $86 million.

 

The problem is that federal authorities took the items from people who hadn't been accused of a crime, including Pearsons and Store.

 

They've been able to keep it because of the country's vague standards of civil forfeiture law, which allows the government to seize property and assets without any actual evidence of criminal wrongdoing.

 

During the raid, the authorities also seized Joseph Ruiz's life savings.

 

The unemployed chef, who had a side job selling bongs made from liquor bottles, had stored $57,000 in his safety deposit box.

 

Prosecutors argued that he couldn't possibly make enough money to have that much saved up and accused him of being an unlicensed marijuana dealer.

 

He went to court to get his money back and won. The government dropped its case against him after he was able to provide documents that showed the source of his money was legitimate.

 

"It was a complete violation of my privacy," Ruiz told the Los Angeles Times. "They tried to discredit my character."

 

Ruiz is one of 800 people whose money and property were taken in the March 22 raid. Six months later, the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles hasn't been able to prove criminal wrongdoing by the majority of box holders whose belongings the government is actively trying to keep.

 

Like Ruiz, 65 others have filed court documents claiming the government grab was unconstitutional.

 

more

https://www.yahoo.com/news/federal-authorities-cash-safety-box-110000293.html

Anonymous ID: 1b80e2 Sept. 27, 2021, 6:29 a.m. No.14671540   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1561 >>1635

>>14671517

23 PAIN

 

Google and 23andme

 

23andMe Is Terrifying, but Not for the Reasons the FDA Thinks

The genetic-testing company's real goal is to hoard your personal data

 

By Charles Seife on November 27, 2013

 

…Sound paranoid? Consider the case of Google. (One of the founders of 23andMe, Anne Wojcicki, is presently married to Sergei Brin, the founder of Google.)

 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/

Anonymous ID: 1b80e2 Sept. 27, 2021, 6:40 a.m. No.14671577   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1603

What dirt is John Oliver trying to hide? He went sideways once Trump was elected.

 

John Oliver reminded “Last Week Tonight” viewers on Sunday that things could always be worse.

 

As he delved into sweeping voter suppression laws enacted by GOP-led states across the country, Oliver noted that some of the pushes were taking place in the most closely contested states in the 2020 election: Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin, where President Joe Biden’s combined margin of victory was just under 43,000 votes.

 

“If they had gone the other way, [Donald] Trump would still be president right now,” Oliver said. “Meaning COVID would be even worse, we’d be at war with, I don’t know, let’s say Luxembourg, and we’d all be living under attorney general MyPillow guy.”

 

He added: “I know things are bleak right now, but depressingly, it’s also important to remember: This is technically the better timeline.”

 

video at link but why

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/john-oliver-paints-picture-life-104526309.html

Anonymous ID: 1b80e2 Sept. 27, 2021, 6:55 a.m. No.14671635   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1770 >>2194

>>14671540

Article from a few days ago also mentioning 23andme. Interesting timing.

 

‘Wildly political’ environment around vaccines creates room for ‘new leadership’: 23andMe CEO

 

The upcoming vaccine mandate for large companies announced by President Joe Biden earlier this month has drawn fervent backlash from prominent Republicans. Gov. Henry McMaster, of South Carolina, said he would fight it "to the gates of hell," while Mississippi's Gov. Tate Reeves called it "terrifying."

 

The political divide over the business mandate has become the latest battleground over the vaccine, now months after it was made widely available for U.S. adults and showed effective in preventing severe illness from COVID-19.

 

In a new interview, 23andMe CEO Anne Wojcicki, whose company makes at-home DNA tests, called the environment around vaccines "wildly political," saying that the discord creates space for "additional leadership" from allies of the scientific community who do not hail from traditional institutions like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

 

23andMe could play a role in providing some of that leadership, Wojcicki said, since the company sells a science-based health care product directly to consumers.

 

"Obviously, this is wildly political," she says of sentiment surrounding the COVID-19 vaccine. "What that has done is it's opened up a door for additional leadership.

 

"I'm incredibly supportive of the agencies out there — the CDC and FDA — and it's really hard to be a scientific leader right now," she adds. "But I do … [think] the public is hungry for other people that they can relate to."

 

As part of its vaccination push, the Biden administration has drawn on advocacy from celebrities like actress Eva Longoria, Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, and singer-songwriter Olivia Rodrigo. Meanwhile, other prominent figures, like rapper Nicki Minaj, have cast doubt on the safety of the vaccine.

 

The divide over vaccination has also given rise to a class of influencers who spread misinformation about the shots over social media. Only 12 people are responsible for up to 73% of anti-vaccine misinformation on Facebook, according to a report released in March by advocacy group Center for Countering Digital Hate.

 

In highlighting alternative sources of scientific information, Wojcicki pointed to actress Gwyneth Paltrow, who contracted COVID-19 early in the pandemic and has posted vaccine information on the website of her lifestyle company Goop.

 

"One thing that I do think that the science world has missed is that people are looking more and more to relate to their physician, and to the science and make the information something that they can actually understand," Wojcicki says.

 

"I think that the scientific medical world is still kind of stuck into a world of white coats — call me by my title, and I use names that you can't understand, and I include a package insert that no one can read," she adds.

 

Wojcicki, who has led 23andMe since its founding in 2006, spent nearly a decade on Wall Street as a health care analyst. Her scientific background dates back at least as far as her college education at Yale University, where she earned a degree in biology.

 

Speaking to Yahoo Finance, Wojcicki said that businesses like 23andMe develop health care relationships with consumers, making them well-positioned to play a leadership role amid disagreements over interpretations of science-based information.

 

"I think there has to be some of that consumerization of health care," she says.

 

"There's actually an opportunity for 23andMe — we tried to do this to have more of a role in scientific leadership," she adds. "Because I do think that people are looking for what to believe."

 

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/23-and-me-ceo-on-covid-vaccines-143725529.html

Anonymous ID: 1b80e2 Sept. 27, 2021, 7:30 a.m. No.14671800   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1850

>>14671770

Oh, she said it.

"23and me could play a role in providing some of that leadership"

 

What's interesting is their new narrative is that the shots are "Political." No, they're not. People pushed back on Trump as well.

Being anti FORCED anything isn't "political."

FORCED is not FREEDOM

Anonymous ID: 1b80e2 Sept. 27, 2021, 7:34 a.m. No.14671813   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1855

>>14671776

>session

Only Session that needs to be brought.

 

(noticed many people out in the Matrix, growing tired of the white noise around the election fraud hype. People are sounding tired of the string- it-out hopium. Food for thought Wendy)

Anonymous ID: 1b80e2 Sept. 27, 2021, 7:56 a.m. No.14671956   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14671867

>>14671885

Recent 3 yr delta. Search Q drops re: Sessions

 

4773

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 09/26/2020 19:32:51

 

What did we learn this week?

  1. Durham 'true' start?

  2. Durham 'take-over' Huber [select parts re: CF-i]?

What if there's another prosecutor (outside of DC) assigned by SESSIONS w/ the same mandate/authority?

Q

Anonymous ID: 1b80e2 Sept. 27, 2021, 8:46 a.m. No.14672265   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2305

>>14672255

> The Clinton Brand has become publicly toxic.

Interesting that "Impeachment" has been airing on TV the past few weeks.

 

One line BC said was "This is a witch hunt."

Kek'd out loud