Anonymous ID: df0695 Sept. 29, 2021, 8:02 p.m. No.14690614   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14690399

>In a decision last year, a federal court of appeals concluded that โ€œlaw,โ€ in Section 2302, doesnโ€™t include an executive branch regulation or order. Rather, โ€œlawโ€ means a valid statute

 

Why would an appeals court need to "conclude" that?

 

That should be part of civics 101 FFS.

 

Absolute basics.

 

Laws have sections such as "the president may at his discretion" or the secstate or whatever. EOs fill in the blanks to those sections, that's ALL.

Anonymous ID: df0695 Sept. 29, 2021, 8:16 p.m. No.14690771   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14690686

>https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2021/09/spartacus/

>>14690713

>https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2021/09/spartacus/

 

Fucking niggers can't search engine

https://malcolmpollack.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/COVID-19-The-Spartacus-Letter.pdf

 

anyone got a TL;DR on that