One of the unique phenomenons around Julian Assange is that he is unifying in all sectors.

Both political parties in the US want him gone in order to protect their corruption and to legally gag exposure of their future crimes:

and both subsets of citizens (self declared liberal or conservative) generally want him free in order to continue to expose that very same corruption.

His case, represents the flow of power, and who indeed will control the direction we as a People take.

Are we to be the toys of despots whose homes are gated and workplaces gilded in barbed wire? Or will the voice of the People be heard and their mounting pressure force a reckoning with the out-of-touch criminal elite?

There is a curious cost here, that hangs in the balance.

If the US proceeds with trying for the extradition, they may succeed in gaining terrifyingly powerful legal precedent to silence you, but in doing so; will have utterly lost the will of the People. It will be a self injurious wound in the end that will likely usher in their collective downfall (if we are to measure by historical standard at least).

If they back away from this corrupt case, as they certainly should; then free speech has won, new generations of leakers will be doubly emboldened, and while humanity will benefit across the board; for the elitists whose lives depend on their crimes being kept hidden, it spells certain doom.

This catch 22, places us in an interesting paradigm that we, as a world connected by nearly instant communication, have never been in before.

The choices of the elite are neither one going to benefit them.

However, if they truly intend on remaining in power, it would be wise to remember that authority to rule is delegated, it is not a right. It can be removed, and if it is forcefully removed by virtue of a true failure of rule, it can be ugly indeed.

The days ahead, either way, promise a great deal of change. I am reminded of Bobby Kennedy's words spoken so long ago about latin america in 1966:

"A revolution is coming – a revolution which will be peaceful if we are wise enough; compassionate if we care enough; successful if we are fortunate enough – but a revolution which is coming whether we will it or not. We can affect its character; we cannot alter its inevitability"

Candace Owens:

Someone told me that buried deep in the Trillion dollar spending bill is an expansion of power for OSHA on small businesses? Can anyone confirm this is true?

@CandaceOwens

Yes. Buried deep in Biden’s 3 trillion dollar spending fiasco are increases in OSHA fines. Essentially he is attempting to give Osha the power to fine small businesses that do not comply with them, out of existence by increasing the fines tenfold.

This tyranny cannot pass.

@CandaceOwens

>>14694722

Forgot to include image…

EWillHelpYou:

The enemy always overplays its hand.

In seeking to destroy him, they themselves will be destroyed.

The Eastern District of Virginia oversees the Assange case directly.

So effective has our calling campaign been that superiors there have begun instructing their operators to lie to you and say that they either have nothing to do with the case, or are not taking calls on the case.

Both of those statements are lies.

It would be a shame if thousands more began calling them over it all, pointing out their corrupt dealings with Siggi the pedophile, and their plotting to murder Assange and his family.

—

This is their direct number, as provided by the Department of Justice's National Security Division who is directing all calls on the matter to them, as the EDVA oversees it directly.

Go, my friends, be their ever-present headache. Call and politely demand they free Assange, and do not be swayed.

Together, your voices are incredibly powerful, and now is the time to use them.

(+1-703-299-3700)

Donald J. Trump:

If Democrats are able to piece together their huge tax hikes, called by another name, it will mean an additional 40 Republican seats in the House and at least a few additional Republican Senators in the U.S. Senate.

Snuck into the government funding bill, or CR, the Democrats are trying to pass, and just found, is unlimited money to random, unscreened, unvetted Afghan nationals. Republicans can't let this happen. This is a further insult after Biden's humiliating withdrawal from Afghanistan, that needlessly killed 13 Americans.

This is not a “clean” government funding bill. It’s a major immigration rewrite that allows Biden to bring anyone he wants from Afghanistan for the next year—no vetting, no screening, no security—and fly them to your

community with free welfare and government-issued IDs. We’ve already seen some of the horrible assaults and sex crimes that have taken place. But these terrible assaults will just be the tip of the iceberg of what’s coming if this isn’t shut down.

The CR even covers people who don’t live in Afghanistan and haven’t in many years, as long as they used to live there. So Biden and Blinken can load up planes of former Afghans from Pakistan or elsewhere without any limits, checks or even a lawful visa or refugee status. The only “rule” is that Mayorkas—an incompetent radical—give them a green light. This bill must be opposed!

Australians do not have freedom of speech, and one particular former Australian Health Worker has reached out to me to help get the word out about what is going on in Australia. I will publish the letter as it was received:

Dear Fellow Australians,

When we look back at this chapter in history, how will we be able to reconcile with ourselves that we didn’t speak up in times of injustice?

I am a (former) Australian health worker who has recently quit my profession so I can speak up.

Right now, a vast number of Australians are being coerced into taking the COVID-19 vaccine.

The government tells us if we don’t take the vaccine, despite any legitimate concerns we may have, there are repercussions.

We are pushed out of our jobs.

We are barred from taking part in society.

We are attacked by the police "for our health".

Besides the few who can work remotely, many other areas of work are directly affected: people working in healthcare, education, law enforcement, the construction industry, the hospitality industry, aviation … the list goes on.

Vaccine passports and mandates are simply an underhanded method of coercing a population into taking vaccines. The programs were designed to create a strong atmosphere of discrimination while providing a peculiar incentive to take the vaccine not only for our health, but to also re-gain privileges in society.

A person’s vaccine status tells very little, and it’s being used to disproportionately affect every aspect of everyday life.

A person’s vaccine status does not reflect health status.

A person’s vaccine status does not distinguish between whether they’ve survived COVID or have never had the disease.

A person’s vaccine status does not display the strength of protection they still have, since vaccine efficacy does wane with time.

A person’s vaccine status does not take into account any of the various co-morbidities that may put an individual at heightened risk of contracting/surviving COVID.

We know the vaccine carries a variety of potential risks depending on age and various pre-existing health conditions.

Where there’s risk, there must be choice.

From the Australian Immunisation handbook: "It (the vaccine) must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation.”

We have lost our ability to move freely.

We are unable to keep our jobs or go shopping in certain places.

We are being stripped of our fundamental human right to make informed choices for our health.

We have to take the jab to gain back these “freedoms”.

Coercion is not consent.