The Crown changed hands.
The Royals got OWNED - They now have new bosses (someone with deep ties to southern USA)
Research needs to be not just her but the invite list and the ones invited and declined.
That would be auto correct on a phone the name was not stored in. Still odd.
The wedding is all symbolism. IE Charles was only allowed to walk her down the last bit of the isle.
Symbolism. The new Crown owners shifted it dramatically.
In my perception yes. I do not know who now orders the Royals. One anon said that the bride was a cousin of Bill Clinton - I do not know. It could be white or black hats - just Southern USA stood out.
What was the name of the USA preacher at the wedding that is good start other than the bride.
Thanks
Preacher
Chicago, New York, and North Carolina connections
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Curry_%28bishop%29
Political marriage
Why Markle - the only one the new boss offered that was even close to fitting the personality of the recipient? The way this works is they parade many 'acceptable' options before the royal and they get to choose within a timeline from the old guard.
Markle is not a normal option even for a 7th son.
The Crown is political in all aspects.
They got owned and told there were new alliances.