WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "FORCIBLE RAPE" AND "RAPE"? IS IT LIKE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "ALONE" AND "SUCCESS" AS IN BILL CLINTO vs. GENERAL MI LI?
In 1968 there was an article on the first page of the Los Angeles Times about two scientists at Hahnemann Medical College who had wondered about the same thing as I – only they decided to find the answer through experimentation with mice. They put a batchful (sic) of mice, all genetically of the same strain, in aluminum cylinders, about six inches or so in diameter, half in a magnetic field environment the same as we live in, and the other half in a magnetic field environment equivalent to being halfway between the Earth and our Moon. Both sets of cylinders had the same physical environment, the same number of male and female mice, the same food, the same lighting, the same play environment, and the same water supply. After three months the mice in the low-density cylinders all suffered the same effects: first, they all simply came apart, all in their protein structure; and second, over 35% suffered visible cancers which could be considered head-to-toes. No analysis was made of internal cancers.
During my conferences with them in Philadelphia, they told me that there was something which was not released to the press, and was not generally known. They hoped I could help them with reasons for these results, which disturbed them.
The first thing they told me was that the mice turned criminal in their low-density magnetic field environment. “Criminal!?” I exclaimed. “How in the dickens do you tell when a mouse turns criminal?” I asked.
“Very simple,” was the answer. “There are basic end-cruelties for almost all mammals; mice and humans are not exception. Cannibalism is the ultimate cruelty, and they turned cannibalistic. Even though they had plenty of the same food as the mice in the normal magnetic field strength cylinders, they indulged in cannibalism as a preference. The mice in the normal cylinders treated each other normally – and ate only their normal food.” He paused a moment.
“There’s another thing which really confounds us,” he continued. “These same mice who turned cannibalistic indulged in forcible rape literally around the clock. That and murder are the other end-cruelties.”
“Is it possible that you can tell the difference between rape and forcible rape in mice?” I asked. “It seems impossible to differentiate in mice.”
“Oh yes,” he said, “It happens all the time in the animal world. For instance, sea lions and sea elephants. They use forcible rape commonly. In these mice, almost every act of sexual intercourse in the low-density cylinders was forcible rape, whereas in the normal cylinders, we never say it. Of course, we must assume it may have happened when we weren’t looking.”
“Of course, in humans it’s easy to differentiate between forcible rape and rape,” I offered.
“Legally, it may not be so easy to differentiate,” he replied, “but morally I guess it’s easy. But what we’re interested in here is why they resorted to forcible rape just because of the environment of a low-density magnetic field. We were hoping you could give us at least a concept to go on.”
I told him that my work did involve the study of legends concerning civilizations in the years leading to cataclysms, when the Earth’s magnetic field was decreasing at an increasing rate as they approached the null zone; and in every instance it appeared that criminality – essentially man’s inhumanity to man – appeared to become overwhelming. Even the Navajo Indians spoke of it in their legend of their approach to a cataclysm, but they called it adultery. It’s quite possible that their definition of rape in any form, be it forcible or not, was included in the term “adultery”.