Deflection - the subject is RRN's lack of credible sources.
>plenty of credible sources
Please list them. Not inferences, plausible possibles - real credible sources other than "our source said."
You cannot, because they do not exist.
>you probably not once checked anything out that the website reported, you just automatically went into defensive mode and started shooting down the content…typical shill reaction…
>
You assume, and project, too much.
Now go pay your subs (or is the pot yours?):
https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-support-real-raw-news