Anonymous ID: 51a189 Oct. 5, 2021, 5:02 a.m. No.14725120   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5149

>>14725105

Two Hypotheses:

  1. Trump plays publicity and assumes those who know, know he has to - and won't get it even though he says it.

  2. Vaccine is a placebo, you are watching a movie, the old guard being dismantled for your pleasure so you can stop being a whiny faggot and enjoy life now that the "satanic cabal" that was responsible for all the evil in the world is dead. I think I read a similar story in a really old book somewhere, kek.

 

Bonus Hypothesis:

  1. Trump is evil :((

Anonymous ID: 51a189 Oct. 5, 2021, 5:19 a.m. No.14725178   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5193

>>14725162

 

I like the "full control" hypothesis best.

For those asking "well, then why not just disclose everything and publicly arrest everyone?"

 

I think those Anons underestimate how ingrained certain views on reality are with many people, and especially leaders around the world.

 

If Certain technology and.. worldly affairs.. were to be disclosed in a rushed way, I think there are certain people in positions of power, who, not out of cabal affiliation, but out of sheer terror, would cause absolute mayhem.

Anonymous ID: 51a189 Oct. 5, 2021, 5:23 a.m. No.14725204   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5206 >>5218

>>14725193

It's not good, but by taking away the "antivaxx" (god I hate that term) angle vs. trump, the media has SO MUCH LESS angles of attack, and are forced to contradic themselves

a la

> MUH TRUMP Q ANTIVAXXERS

vs

>Trump literally telling people to get vaccinated

 

I think It's a tradeoff, but a smart one. Art of the deal

Anonymous ID: 51a189 Oct. 5, 2021, 5:24 a.m. No.14725207   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5226

>>14725194

>We're the disposable deplorables.

But aren't we the ones NOT taking the vaxx?

If that were their plan, the population after the "culling" would be much harder to control, with the free thinkers making up a significantly larger portion of the population, no?

Anonymous ID: 51a189 Oct. 5, 2021, 5:29 a.m. No.14725227   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5240

>>14725218

>Going against it would be wrong,

This is what I was saying, Anon. It would just offer angles of attack.

>why would trump care about the media?

maybe he cares about the souls of the world being mentally attacked by news organizations

Anonymous ID: 51a189 Oct. 5, 2021, 5:36 a.m. No.14725255   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14725240

>Maybe it's some "I will destroy myself, so that the people will figure out not to trust any leader"

 

This is something I hadn't considered, but is a smart thought.

MAybe he is trying to avoid everyone projecting their salvation onto one human, because this has happened before and resulted in organized oppression the likes of which were unprecedented.

Anonymous ID: 51a189 Oct. 5, 2021, 5:47 a.m. No.14725318   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5336

>>14725300

You misunderstand, Anon.

"Fema-Camp Fear Porn" was not referring to the literal existence of FEMA facilities.

It was referring to the conspiracy theories that ware, and judging by your posts, still ARE making their rounds on the internet.

Conspiracy theories that say they will round up all the free thinkers, and murder them or put them into camps.

 

THAT is the fear porn, not the EXISTENCE of the camps themselves.

 

I hope I worded things sufficiently simple this time.

Anonymous ID: 51a189 Oct. 5, 2021, 5:55 a.m. No.14725354   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5372 >>5646

>>14725336

..adding that I kind of get where you are coming from, being mindful of possibilities and being strong in your principles BEFORE shit hits the fan is important, you are correct in saying that. Because if you don't you will not have enough time to think properly when the time comes.

 

I still think a large part of the FEMA-Camp-Rounding people up to exterminate free-thinkers/dissenters is ridiculous fear porn though.

Anonymous ID: 51a189 Oct. 5, 2021, 5:59 a.m. No.14725375   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5393

>>14725355

Why do they need this if they already have HAARP-like behavior control?

Not sure if it was HAARP but there was some technology where the official government website said it could be used to calm people in crisis situations kek

Gimme some of that vintage fear porn

Anonymous ID: 51a189 Oct. 5, 2021, 6:02 a.m. No.14725390   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5409

>>14725372

Alright, well it seems like we don't disagree that much.

>because otherwise something happens and you have no idea what you are doing and that causes stress and makes you easier to control.

correct and based

 

>I'm not in fear of any of that.

Which is the most important thing. Anons must leave fear behind. Stops God from acting.

 

>it's a given that they are for anti-vaxxers, they even tell you. They do not hide it.

I don't buy that for a second though. Maybe as some kind of publicity stunt to finally get people off their asses and revolt.

Anonymous ID: 51a189 Oct. 5, 2021, 6:08 a.m. No.14725416   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14725409

I mean in that case, shit's poppon because free will remains intact

. If you want to believe lies, you will continue to do so and pay the price (not referring to you Anon, but the people willingly going to the camps in your hypothetical scenario.).

No tears need to be shed there.

Anonymous ID: 51a189 Oct. 5, 2021, 6:10 a.m. No.14725426   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5466

>>14725412

That is a legitimate question, Anon. The best explanation I have for that is that certain people in certain positions of power would go absolutely apeshit when disclosure comes before ALL strings are cut, taking out vast amounts of civilization and lives with them.

 

think about political leaders who are genuinely religious fundamental extremists with access to devastating weapons.

Anonymous ID: 51a189 Oct. 5, 2021, 6:12 a.m. No.14725433   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14725431

>Of course they have already subverted our free will by every psychological manipulation possible but now it medical manipulation of brains and bodies

 

If you believe that, you have already lost. No war without casualties, though.

Anonymous ID: 51a189 Oct. 5, 2021, 7:14 a.m. No.14725746   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14725730

I hope you will have to admit that some obscure internet personality being banned from a site you can't even name for reasons you probably got from them, and have NOT got an archive of the posts that caused him to get banned, is evidence of any kind.

That's just bad researchmanship.