What if 'anti-CRT' isn't a correct description of a parents' actual beliefs when they PREFER TO EDUCATE ABOUT UNITY AND PEACE INSTEAD OF CRT?
Why is the assumption being made by the Attorney General that to want to teach children that we are united, instead of teaching we are divided, why is that being smeared and attacked as being 'anti'-CRT as if wanting to teach unity is a hostile, opposing, dangerous threat?
CRT presented as 'you're either an advocate or a hater' is bait to divide people no matter what their REAL views are, according to THAT narrative INSTEAD OF a narrative of unity and peace.
Why is the AG INTENTIONALLY TRYING TO DIVIDE PARENTS FROM THEIR OWN CHILDREN ON WHAT IS AT ROOT A PHILOSOPHICAL QUESTION?