>>14725120

>1. Trump plays publicity

I have no idea what he is thinking.

Sure his supporters may be more of the "I will think for myself"-types, but still there will be some who take it. It's one thing to not take sides, but this is simply silly

>2. Vaccine is a placebo

Almost everyone I know who got the 2nd dose went ill for days.

Placebo won't do that.

>3. Trump is evil

idk

Maybe he is also pretending to be evil, because he was supposed to win, so that the rest of the club feels safe. That's the best bet I have.

1. these are fake news and or deep fakes

Still if that's the case, why doesn't Trump sue?

>>14725157

Yeah.

I tend to he was supposed to win in the first place (remember MAGA caps, RED RED RED) and is now playing his part, either because he's on their side, or because he is pretending to be on their side to make them feel safe and continue on with their plans.

In the end it may be up to the people to stop it all, so there is that.

I guess not even the club knows for sure anymore kek.

>>14725178

>I like the "full control" hypothesis best.

I personally only know of one possible death, and one possible really severe side effect (this neurological issue, Baree or whatever the French fuck it is).

And for these severe issues at least in theory cures should exist.

It's still not good to tell supporters to take it.

>>14725204

Why would Trump care about the fake news?

Especially in this case here at least for me atm it would make way more sense to be neutral.

Going against it would be wrong, I guess. and he already informed the world about HCQ.

Of course you could try to reverse psychology angle, like saying that to keep democrat voters from taking it "muh Trump recommends it, no way I'm taking this shit", still that is really pushing it, especially because it pushes Trump supporters under the bus at the same time.

What's also weird is that sometimes he says "the vaccine" (which???) and somes it's about vaccines (plural), so which one is it? And why does no one ask him?

Again: even if there is some logic behind it and it makes sense from that viewpoint, it would still be stupid to do retarded riddles when it's about the well being about the people.

>>14725223

It being placebo makes no real sense, because how would you take down all these institutions when all they did was promote a placebo that did nothing to anyone?

That would be silly and wouldn't work in court.

>>14725227

Telling them to take the poison makes no sense at all, even when he cares about their mental well being. Their mental well being will go kaput when they figure out that they were poisoned.

You know Trump in March 2020 was great. HCQ. "injecting disinfectants" - "oh I meant that sacastically", while knowing that vaccines before and especially these ones contains disinfectants.

Now that was all great and it makes sense, and it doesn't HAVE to make sense to the average Joe for now. That's brilliant.

Pushing that vaxx onto people isn't.

Maybe it's some "I will destroy myself, so that the people will figure out not to trust any leader", still he could do that in another way. I really don't understand it.

>>14725239

Fema camps aren't fake either.

What could happen of course is that the Fema camps in the end will get filled with tratiors instead of innocent healthy civilians ("unvaccinated")

>>14725257

>It does not matter what is or is not in the syringe

Yes.

They could in fact have gone with placebo, to ease everyone in.

"see it doesn't cause any problems tehe"

"see, just another booster, still doing nothing to anyone tehe"

"see, just use the vaxx passports so that you are safe tehe"

and then insert poison slowly a year later.

>>14725318

>fear porn

this implies that there is no way that this would happen, similar to there will never be any food shortage what-so-ever.

That's not fear porn. It's about preparing for such a case.

Like for example understanding that to stock up on foods NOW, so that IF there should anything happen, you are prepared.

Same for FEMA. IF there is a food shortage and they tell you "well, what do you know, we got plenty of foods in these camps, just came to the trains", then you will be prepared and know to go the other way.

So saying anything about it is about PREPARING, not about fear porn. COVID is fear porn. Talking about potential FEMA / food issues is not, it's about being prepared.

Being prepared is good.

Fear is based.

Fear happens when you are not prepared.

>>14725336

>Fear is based

kek, I meant fear is BAD.

That's why the powers that be use FEAR based mind control.

Let's assume there is food shortage at some point. What happens?

>prepared ones:

"oh well, who cares, I got stocked up months ago"

>unprepared ones:

"omg, what do I do what do I do, I don't want to starve" ←– FEAR BASED MIND CONTROLLED

Same for FEMA

>prepared:

"No, I will not go on the trains to their camps, because I know what they are up to"

>unprepared:

"fuck, got no food, well I will go on the trains, they promised me food" ←- FEAR BASED MIND CONTROLLED

>>14725340

That sentence makes no sense when you read the rest of my post. It was a typo, I'm too used to type fear BASED mind CONTROL.

>>14725354

Exactly.

it's not that I go on with "omg, they will get me to the camps", I'm thinking about potential situations and preparing how to react if that situation comes.

That's logical and good, because otherwise something happens and you have no idea what you are doing and that causes stress and makes you easier to control.

>I still think a large part of the FEMA-Camp-Rounding people up to exterminate free-thinkers/dissenters is ridiculous fear porn though.

There are quarantine camps in all sorts of countries.

it's a given that they are for anti-vaxxers, they even tell you. They do not hide it. They are also already isolating people for a year now.

What's fear porn about saying that?

I'm not in fear of any of that. Why should I?

I'm prepared. I can live for months without leaving my house, and I'm prepared in other ways too. That's the opposite of fear.

>>14725355

>They wont need FEMA camps soon, they will willingly go in lockdown because of the dopamine high

The FEMA camps are for the unvaxxed, not for the sheeple.

>>14725390

>Maybe as some kind of publicity stunt to finally get people off their asses and revolt.

The Nazis did put tons of people into camps.

Do you think they did that like they show in the movies?

No, they told the people a lie about just having to go to the camps because BS-lie.

The same shit is done here. It's all based on lies. Everything.

And when people know, it's way harder if not even impossible to have tons of people go to camps. But using a lie, you can make them go willingly, just like they just inject tons of poison into tons of willing people.

>>14725451

Corona Virus

Completely Fake

>>14725720

Nope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Nathaniel_de_Rothschild#Imprisonment