>>14734081

searched "PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING UNCLASSIFIED DISCOVERY" clicked one of the random links not knowing wtf any of it is, could be way off base, not lawfag anon:

"This pocket guide is about the use of protective orders to keep discovery confidential in both civil and criminal cases. Although a

strong presumption of public access applies to evidence admitted

at trial or considered by the court to decide the merits of a case,

parties now undertake discovery away from the court. Experience

has proved confidentiality protective orders to grease the wheels of

discovery in many cases. Parties are often more willing to produce

requested discovery when they know that such production does not

necessarily make the information public."

appears to be something along the lines of protecting source of info submitted for trials

https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/media/publications/Confidential%20Discovery%20A%20Pocket%20Guide%20on%20Protective%20Orders%20Federal%20Judicial%20Center%202012.pdf

>>14734140

currently glancing the referenced case file for more info, lots of potential discovery that would lead back to higher ups and damning comms could sink ships. sussman claimed to be working alone, not for anybody which is indicated as known false in the indictment

"In fact, and as alleged in further detail

below, this statement was intentionally false and misleading because, in assembling and conveying

these allegations, SUSSMANN acted on behalf of specific clients, namely, (i) a U.S. technology

industry executive ("Tech Executive-I") at a U.S. Internet company ("Internet Company-I"), and

(ii) the Hillary Clinton Presidential Campaign (the "Clinton Campaign")"

https://www.justice.gov/sco/press-release/file/1433511/download