>>14732935 (pb)
But you aren't falling for the fear-mongering on both sides if you can think logically, anon.
>>14732965 (pb)
And anons don't think anything is happening. Remember "Regulate or Kill"? Screenshot related.
I think having everyone aghast at the prospect of the gov't taking the reins over Facebook is part of the point to get everyone paying attention to what their future could be like "if we continue down this path of blindness to the truth". Post 2024, gov't regulation will be reined back, but in the meantime, over regulation will allow for "fail-safes" to be in place to prevent shit, like, say, human trafficking operations running on them.
Anons picking up what I'm putting down? We're all supposed to be in a state of panic and fear that "Revelation" is happening before our eyes. It's supposed to "wake everyone up" to the reality they live in. Some places have it really bad right now (Australia). The USA is way behind the curve of places like Sweden/Denmark, where COVID is now "just a thing".
Sure, it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better, but we're talking really bad only if you were crazy enough to stay in the cities. I mean, if places like Chicago, Atlanta, and LA haven't been a warning for the past 30 years, then nothing will get through to some folks. The mass migration we're seeing now? That's always been happening. It's just that right now, we're getting a very clear look at just how bad it's been. Just remember, God Wins.
If Dan shows up at anon's house, that would be awesome.