Anonymous ID: afc0bd Oct. 7, 2021, 1:06 p.m. No.14741020   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1097

>>14740920

That started around the middle of 2019, maybe toward the end.

In my estimation, Q made two very crucial mistakes:

  1. Promoting too much evangelical bullshit. This already has and will inevitably cause(d) large complications that will need to be corrected later down the road.

Don't misunderstand, I consider myself a Christian, I just think there were better ways to win over "pious" boomers.

  1. Q gave in to one of the most obvious attack vectors of the movement/board in condoning "baker wars" by speaking to the importance of notables.

I can concede that having something to easily link back to here on QR for other sites that stave off normalfag floods makes sense for disseminating information, but I think Q could've easily worded things better, which was more conducive to the unavoidable complications that speaking to the ego of the bakers caused.

I think that between these two things and the complacency of anons around here, causing the community to forget to socialize newfags, has created very large hurdles.

 

I feel these days /pol/ is once again the go to place to have proper discussions and I also find there are less morans there and that the infiltrators are easier to spot.

With all of that being said, I still deeply appreciate the anons that still come here and, clearly, Q and /ourguys/. However, I think my attention is best focused in other areas. The spiritual warfare is important right now and metanarratives and varying levels of memetics needs some tending to, but I'm not sure how much help I can be here these days.

Anonymous ID: afc0bd Oct. 7, 2021, 1:10 p.m. No.14741048   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14740937

There's a great deal of evidence that developing a shielding creole and tempering ego is both a fruitful thing to do and more or less necessary for this place's proper function.

Either way, your point about balancing appropriately energies within our selves makes a great deal of sense and I think many could benefit from a reframing or remembering of the ways in which we interact.

Anonymous ID: afc0bd Oct. 7, 2021, 1:24 p.m. No.14741125   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1175

>>14741097

Yeah, we're in agreement here. I can see how there could be intentions that designed a disharmony, but it looks to have been a mistake on Q's part.

From what I understand of oldfags who were around from before me, they would have shit on Q and anons relentlessly for echoing talking points about modern spiritual movements, just like they'd berate the shit out of anyone not doing their own research and asking for hand outs.

Maybe I'm a retard for trying to "carry the torch", but I'm leaning toward many getting recruited or having given up for reasons like those I listed.

Of course, being wrong would be fine too. I'm just offering an observation.

Anonymous ID: afc0bd Oct. 7, 2021, 1:37 p.m. No.14741202   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1218

>>14741176

I can understand why someone would focus on this point of contention, but I'm unsure to what extent it matters what was or wasn't Q Clearance Patriot by now. Regardless of any of that, the movement has spread out to the size and effect it has today because of the continued fruit of "Q drops".

Clock was important for mapping deltas, which may or may not further confirmation bias or veracity in a similar manner.

I suspect your intentions aren't that pure, however.

Anonymous ID: afc0bd Oct. 7, 2021, 2:08 p.m. No.14741377   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14741338

The issue is Truth has been subjected to Shrodinger's influence and these days Truth is often both real and not real at the same time.

Words like "truth" or "fact" are often substitutes for "consensus" these days.

I would be patient, anon.

I'm also eagerly awaiting bigger signs.