>>14746706
Thank you for that. I have never heard of it before. This makes total sense now to me, in theory. The past 20 years have been a HUGE "Scientific" Experiment based on this theory that they started planning in 1997. Who "they" is is anyones guess
"According to the theory, historical events are associated with recurring generational personas (archetypes). Each generational persona unleashes a new era (called a turning) lasting around 20–25 years, in which a new social, political, and economic climate (mood) exists."
"Strauss–Howe generational theory has also been described by some historians and journalists as pseudoscientific.[6][9][10] "kooky",[11] and "an elaborate historical horoscope that will never withstand scholarly scrutiny."[12][13][14] Academic criticism has focused on the lack of rigorous empirical evidence for their claims,[15] and the authors' view that generational groupings are more powerful than other social groupings such as economic class, race, sex, religion, and political parties."
And some higher ups were secretly betting on if the Theory was correct or not. They were so serious with the betting that they tried to do what they can to push the outcome a certain way…or to "hurry it up"