>>14750716 (lb)
>They killed James Bond. Why? Outside of the obvious desire to destroy the "white patriarchy."
I had no expectations, but thought the movie was great. I got excited about the Q character only to learn afterwards that Q is a military position (a Quartermaster) and has historical roots in military and intelligence circles, which explains its incorporation in 007 movies and also validates another possible reason why "Q" may have been chosen as the name of a backchannel to an awake public by benevolent military planners trying to save the world. "But, but, there were hints in the movie that Q was gay the shills will say." So, fucking what. Richard Grenell is gay, but that makes him no less benevolent or less of a Patriot.
I also don't think the movie's plot was written to "destroy the white patriarchy." All mortal human beings die, including our greatest heroes (even Christ). But, the spirit of truth and humanity lives on in the natural human creation that occurs between heterosexual men and women who are in love. Whether willful or not on behalf of the screenwriters, this pro-humanity theme of the movie could be taken as a big GFYS to Satanic Hollywood transgender elites and Silicon Valley eugenicists like Bill Gates who worship AI and gleefully plan to depopulate the human race with gene modifying bioweapon nanobots while enjoying age reversing blood transfusions from live babies on a google owned ship parked in international waters.
During a memorial for Bond at MI6, M quotes from the American writer Jack London, which first appeared in the San Francisco Bulletin in 1916.
“The proper function of man is to live, not to exist.
I shall not waste my days in trying to prolong them.
I shall use my time.”