>>1475554

It's more likely that because I was posting a lot of IP hashes that Q would request I do it for them as well, this time for the reason of securing their line of integrity [of posts].

¯_(ツ)_/¯

>>1475666

Checked and very possible. The guy [muh-no-hour] seems like a raging narcissist.

I just posted what was requested.

o7

>>1475646

Also, >>1475704

understand the solid setup they have.

Remember though, that the trip wasn't cracked.

It was released in plaintext for us to see, and anons verified by trying it out for themselves, then it quickly became blacklisted.

>>1475719

Factually incorrect.

What we see isn't the full hash, hence the "…" before it.

The 'adversary' would need the whole thing, and the salt (which was changed in the last month or two) and why the hell would they take this route just to find the IP address Q's posting from?

You're silly.

>>1475804

That would be rude.

>>1475900

You're not wrong, and I'm not new to this.

The intent was transparency to clear up any confusion.

>>1476073

>>1476220