Anonymous ID: a2201e Oct. 10, 2021, 12:09 a.m. No.14758324   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14757773

>>14757508 (lb) The Navy sold the USS John F. Kennedy and USS Kitty Hawk for the low, low price of 1 cent each

The navy used to pay the scrappers to get rid of these things. In this case the navy is instead charging them a nominal fee instead of paying them, with the argument being that they will make plenty of money off the scrap they obtain.

Anonymous ID: a2201e Oct. 10, 2021, 12:26 a.m. No.14758377   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14758261

>no, that's not literally true

No, it is literally true. The quantum waveform is collapsed by the ultimate observer; the Logos acting on behalf of God. There is an absolute truth to the universe. The state of all things is known and concrete. Even the hairs of your head are numbered.

Anonymous ID: a2201e Oct. 10, 2021, 12:38 a.m. No.14758428   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8442 >>8446

>>14758416

>Seems like a heavier load than normal of shill shit tonight.

It's been really heavy on night shift every night lately, that I've seen. Mostly due to there being 3-4 active bots plus a lot of people replying to them. Thank fuck they don't reply to each other all that much that I've seen.

Anonymous ID: a2201e Oct. 10, 2021, 12:44 a.m. No.14758449   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8461 >>8464

>>14758440

>Meh. At least half of the videos posted by Q are no longer available.

>Many channels got wiped and some videos were blocked for copyright reasons.

>Does this means that YT targeted Q?

I only consider it notable because that video worked 1-2 nights ago, suggesting they took it down after Trump's rally tonight, or in anticipation of it.

 

>>14758442

>You would think that after all these years, the dumb ass shills would figure out just how stupid they really are, but noooooo. Trump is right, these people really are stooooopid!!

No, "they" are effective at wasting bread and distracting anons. Why would "they" stop?

Anonymous ID: a2201e Oct. 10, 2021, 1:13 a.m. No.14758527   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14758461

>Really? Well, define, "wasting," bread.

Each time it fills up and we need a new one, all the convos and relationships are disrupted. We all switch to new IDs, and referencing material from older breads becomes more difficult (especially for phonefags). Scrolling past and sorting through all the bullshit consumes time. If those fucking bots were gone we'd get a good 100-200 more posts of focus out of each loaf.

Anonymous ID: a2201e Oct. 10, 2021, 1:15 a.m. No.14758534   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8546

>>14758520

>Stating that 100% of the criminal traitors are completely free and still running the entire federal government doesn't really make me a shill.

No, but you ARE an asshole, and a faggot, and your attempts at demoralizing the members of this board and focusing on the negative DO make you a shill. Whether or not you're being paid and whether or not you realize it. You're not contributing anything except darkness. Maybe go suck-start a chevy.

Anonymous ID: a2201e Oct. 10, 2021, 1:21 a.m. No.14758549   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8553

>>14758540

>What are the semantics of '=' vs. '==' in the expression?

In mathematical expressions means "is exactly equal to" (as opposed to ~= which means approximately equal to, or =/= which means not equal to). The single equals sign, at least in programming, typically DEFINES a thing. For example, variable=value would set the value of variable to value. c=1 would set the value of the variable c to 1. Equals signs used in conditional expressions would use the double equal sign. like "if c 1 then" (this would check if c is exactly equal to 1 and if so, the stuff after "then" would get carried out)