Session's Cyber Task Force
Anons,
If you watched Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium, you might remember the 37 TB of data that was never presented:
>To the extent legacy media will even touch the information coming out of the Symposium, it will be to highlight that Lindell’s much vaunted ‘pcap’ data was not presented, leading to broad speculation that Lindell discovered late in the process that he had been duped (possibly by the nefarious Dennis Montgomery).
>Count us as undecided as to what the absence of pcap data signifies. 37 terabytes of fabricated data is a lot to be fabricated, and who exactly has the motive and means to produce fabricated data on that scale is an interesting question. Who exactly led Lindell to believe it had all been verified and validated is another interesting question.
https://americacanwetalk.org/pay-attention-to-the-cyber-symposium-august-10-12/
When I'd heard about it, the first thing that came to mind was "where did he get it?" Lindell has been pretty vague about his sources…but I think I may know who they are.
Run a search for "US50-EIC" on duckduckgo (mentioned in Q#780), and a couple of strange results will pop up. One is a story about Jeff Session's Cyber Task Force (which Q referenced in picrel), the other appears to be a related flyer from the FBI.
https://archive.is/ucJXL (FBI flyer - attached)
https://archive.is/psKNe ("Sessions forms U.S. cyber task force after election warnings")
From the flyer:
>While national-level coordination is important to securing the nation, teamwork at the local level is also essential. After more than a decade of combating cyber crime through a nationwide network of interagency task forces, the FBI has evolved its Cyber Task Forces (CTFs) in all 56 field offices to focus exclusively on cybersecurity threats. In addition to key law enforcement and homeland security agencies at the state and local level, each CTF partners many of the federal agencies that participate in the NCIJTF at the headquarters level. This promotes effective collaboration and deconfliction of efforts at both the local and national level. The CTF role within the field office territory includes:
>• Responding to cyber incidents and conducting victim-based investigations
>• Understanding and addressing the threats, vulnerabilities, and collection >opportunities that exist
>• Maintaining relationships and information sharing with key companies and institutions
The FBI working with internet providers is one of the only ways to collect that much relevant data. When you look at what Lindell has released thus far, it sounds exactly like what one might expect from such a task force:
>In the video, Mike and an anonymous cybersecurity expert summarize 20 attacks in a spreadsheet, providing the following information about each:
>• The time it occurred
>• The IP address* of the source/attacker
>• The IP address* of the destination/target
>• The county whose votes were changed
>• The number of votes that were changed
>• “How they got in”: “CREDENTIALS”, “FIREWALL”, “BOTH”, or “*”
https://archive.is/ncv9e
I'm guessing that Mike Lindell's symposium had a dual purpose: the first was that it was meant to draw talent for those cyber task forces as stated, and the second was that it was a honeypot.
If you had access to that data, you would probably be able to figure out how and where it was collected. If you're an evil pedo election hacker, you could use that knowledge to avoid getting caught. There's no way the FBI would want it to fall into the wrong hands. That having been said, cyber experts are in high demand and there's an immense amount of data to analyze.
As a billionaire with friends, Mike Lindell could conceivably come up with that data on his own. By having Lindell run that Cyber Symposium, the FBI is able to keep its name out of it. By hiding their involvement, the FBI accomplishes a few things:
1) they don't scare off the pedo election hackers
2) they don't scare off patriots that don't trust the feds
3) they keep their investigation on the down-low
Now consider this occurrence:
>In the video below Conradson asks these “reporters” what they are doing here and if they are here to cover the event, or harass and make fun of election integrity. Conradson also asked if they consider themselves an unbiased news network.
>CNN and other leftist networks were filming every individual at the event and they were even sneaking up to record private cellphone and laptop use which Colonel Waldron also acknowledged and referred to as “shoulder surfing”.
>This had been noticed the days prior by Conradson and almost all other attendees.
>Are they providing this information to the FBI?
https://archive.is/pO2xB
I think the answer to that last question is "yes," but not how they think.