Anonymous ID: 839273 May 19, 2018, 9:29 p.m. No.1477219   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1477097

Why would you come here and show yourself to be unworthy of this audience?

 

Every one of your predicates is flawed. Your analysis is flawed. Your conclusions are (irreparably) flawed.

 

Let me give it to you gently, in the manner customary of this forum: youโ€™re a moron and you should fuck right off.

Anonymous ID: 839273 May 19, 2018, 9:39 p.m. No.1477314   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1477222

Youโ€™re looking at the lower part of a signature. Compare the lower half of known DT sigs with the example. They seem close, allowing for natural variability between signatures. The areas of dense activity are relatively close matches.