You should be reading Pat Lang's Turcopolier site.
https://turcopolier.com/is-jake-sullivan-a-target-for-durham/
https://turcopolier.com/dramatis-personae-in-durhams-digging/
The mainstream media fears the tongue-in-cheek critique.
Watkins says that if Assange gets fried, then we all get fried. Maybe he's right, maybe he's wrong. I'm not sure whether we can help Assange, but signing petitions is always an available tactic. Does it do any harm? We're all on at least one watchlist already, we might as well sign a pro-Assange petition.
Given the Southwest Airlines strike, for the past few days I have felt that the good guys are winning. I would like Durham to do something obvious so that the good guys could rally around it, but I don't have access to Durham's strategy.
By this time I assume we have all read the analysis of the Durham situation at:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/
but it looks like the folks who seemed very well-informed just two years ago are currently almost as much in the dark as the average anon.
>Trump failed bigly will you vote for him again?
Hmm, given a choice between a very stable genius who grabs grown women by the pussy and a very demented child-sniffer who grabs little kids, which one looks like a better choice? This should not be a difficult question for most people.
>He did it for the money.
Watkins worked pretty damn hard to make it possible to fight for free speech. You don't have to like him personally I don't but I don't believe he was merely a mercenary. He fought for his notion of freedom. And he is still fighting – he's not dead yet.