>>14788767

Yes. have to watch this develop. Big statement from Trump.

Underlying message is that we're stuck with the situation we have now unless the ability to cheat is taken care of. Don't be thinking you just have tp hold out until Trump is voted in again in 2024. He won't be.

Only way forward is a Trump reinstatement. Voting won't work anymore, and only gives the "victors" the claim that they have a consensus of the population behind them.

Trump's pull to get massive numbers of people to vote only inflated the registered voter lists. Cheaters used those inflated numbers to manipulate the tally for the politicians they chose.

Logical step, IMO, is to do the opposite of a massive GOTV. Tell people not to vote. More importantly, though, the number of people on the voter rolls has to shrink. People have to unregister and demand their name be taken off the voter roll.

Just not voting won't work. The number of registered voters has to be reduced so that the cheaters don't have those slots to play with.

>>14788941

people noe getting "cold" with the same syptoms of Covid might be.

Staying home isn't though. People go to work sick and also send their sick kids to school so they don't have to stay home with them and miss work.

They pump the kids up with fever reducers so it's not too conspicuous at the beginning of school.

>>14788989

I do.

In a crunch situation they will go over the registered voter count if their "man" has to win, but that can't be the norm. It's done in areas where it always happens and can be attributed to incompetent election officials.

So if R and Indies, say, unregister, any R candidate who bought a seat has to be "elected" by crossover dems. If there is no history of a large crossover dem block in that area it becomes too suspicious.

Seth Keshel area, here. Historical voting trends and mathematically possible rises/falls in a party's vote count.