>>1476351 (previous bread)
So, who do Anons think is the "number 1 liberal in black"
A grassroots (no hyphen) movement for the privacy and …. ("for" is standard phrasing, although I understand "to" shows movement)
Censorship affects everyone. (no comma, make the statement, then the justification in a supporting separate sentence following) Imagine a world … aresilenced (tenses must agree) …
And I would make "Why should I care?" (no ellipses) large and maybe red, or blue, or something to stand our. – Also the end phrase, "Will you let your voice … yours." should be bold and red. Or blue. Or somehow made to stand out. Anyways, those are the calls to arms and should be set apart from the explanation.
I thought there were no women here ;).
So, you have a regular oncology exam because you are a cancer survivor? (First assumption, tell me if wrong)
Doctor palpates and "finds something." Were there any followup tests, like CT or MRI? If so, did the doc show you the results?
Also, most female cancer patients that undergo the current versions of treatment end up sterile. Did that happen to you? Because if sterile, then why an ovary? (Sauce: https://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatments-and-side-effects/physical-side-effects/fertility-and-sexual-side-effects/fertility-and-women-with-cancer/how-cancer-treatments-affect-fertility.html)
Thanks, I hate to stick my nose in, but if something looks worthy (and I thought this did) I will put my less than 2 cents on the table.
Were I you, I would see a good lawyer about suing for malpractice immediately. You now are unable to have children naturally, and with your remaining ovary will need funds to allow egg harvesting, in vitro fertilization, and surrogacy if you wish to have children of your own DNA. Not a lawfag, but seems an open and shut case with the harm done to you.
The taking of the ovary when you had no cancer previously is not in accordance with standard practice. In fact the hysterectomy without biopsy showing cancer is not standard practice.
Oh, and cut that "friend" loose, that made the recommendation, or else be very careful with that one in the future and suspicious of "advice" proffered.
Doesn't everyone here know the history of the AMA? Rockefeller institution, kiddos, to take over and control Western med.
Not our friends.
Prickly anon gets filtered. Move on.
Kek!
Yeah, but it's fun messing with all the rinos and nevertrumpers.
Yeah, but it's fun yanking the rino's tail.
And you believe that oncologist, why, exactly?
There will be some viable. That's for the harvesting facility to sort out. And whether or not you actually use the funds for that, you are owed for the damage you suffered and that is the remedy you have available.
It also may decrease the likelihood he will do the same to another vulnerable person.
Agreed. The only difference is the need for someplace to warehouse kids during the day while their parents work outside the home.
So. Parents can band together, rent a small facility, hire a teacher and start their own little red school house. Like used to be done. Communities used to actually be in charge of what their children were taught, not the fedgov.
The Rapture is made up out of whole cloth. Scofield Bible. It's to keep the Christians complacent and lukewarm, smug and hypocritical. It plays to human conceit.
Believe what you will. When things fall apart and you find you are still here, what will you think then? That you fell short of God's grace?
Happy Pentecost. May the true flame of God's Grace descend upon you this day. Amen.
Good day, sir! I say, Good Day!
Kek! ;)