Devin Nunes warns 'future of this country' hinges on Durham indictments

The "future of this country" depends on who is indicted next in special counsel John Durham's criminal inquiry into the Russia investigation, warned a top House Republican.

Rep. Devin Nunes, ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, said Thursday that trust in the Justice Department and FBI among conservatives nationwide hangs in the balance.

"The Biden DOJ can let people off if they would like," the congressman from California said during a Fox News interview, referring to ex-FBI official Andrew McCabe winning back his full pension as part of a settlement with the Justice Department in a wrongful termination lawsuit.

"Durham is still out there," he said. "For the Department of Justice and the FBI to have any support amongst conservatives or half of this country, it’s going to really depend on who Durham indicts, and I think that is what a lot of us are waiting for."

During the Fox News interview, Nunes also scoffed at the news that Bill Clinton's former communications director, George Stephanopoulos, scored an interview with former MI6 agent Christopher Steele. Steele compiled the salacious and discredited anti-Trump "Steele dossier" after being hired by the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which had been hired by the Clinton campaign.

The congressman said it is an "embarrassment" for Hulu, airing the interview onOct. 18,and Disney, which owns a majority stake in the streaming service. Nunes also noted the timing of the interview after stating Steele was uncooperative with the House Intelligence Committee's own Russia investigation.

"There is probably more to come. I'm sure it will be quite a comical and entertaining movie," he said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/devin-nunes-warns-future-country-225900359.html

Double Jeopardy Claim Leads To Indefinite Hold On Retrial In Michael Avenatti Case

SANTA ANA (CBSLA) — The retrial of Michael Avenatti, who is most known for representing adult film actress Stormy Daniels in lawsuits against former President Donald Trump, has been indefinitely put on hold based on an argument of double jeopardy.

Double jeopardy is a procedural defense that prevents someone from getting prosecuted twice for the same crime.

The decision was made on Friday by a federal judge in a Santa Ana court for the retrial that was initially set to be held on Nov. 2.

Currently, Avenatti is attempting to have his case thrown out.

Avenatti is charged with defrauding several clients of nearly $10 million in settlement funds.

A few months ago, he was also sentenced to 30 months in prison for trying to extort nearly $25 million from popular sports company Nike.

In California, Avenatti is facing a 36-count indictment, including charges of wire fraud and failing to file tax returns, eight counts of willful failure to collect and pay over-withheld taxes, two counts of bank fraud, three counts of a false declaration in bankruptcy, and one count each of aggravated identity theft and providing false testimony under oath in bankruptcy. The retrial would be only on the 10 counts of wire fraud, while the remainder of the case would be tried at a later date.

U.S. District Judge James V. Selna vacated the Nov. 2 trial date, saying the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is responsible.

Selna then declared a mistrial on Aug. 24 after reporting a failure to turn over bookkeeping evidence, which he presented as n oversight rather than an act of misconduct.

Avenatti argued in his appeal that he requested to retrieve bookkeeping evidence to prove that he did not defraud his clients, and said his pleas were ignored.

Avenatti said a retrial would violate his rights against double

jeopardy and for due process.

In response to Avenatti’s argument that a retrial would violate double jeopardy, prosecutors said in court papers that Avenatti’s motion was a “frivolous double-jeopardy argument to delay a retrial that he asked for” and that the appellate justices, which Selna said is responsible for the case, has no jurisdiction over the double jeopardy claim.

It’s unclear if and when that retrial will be rescheduled.

https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2021/10/15/retrial-michael-avenatti/

>>14796286

Thinking it's gonna be an eye opener regarding the Co's that pretend they're made in the USA, but really made in China.

Remembering back to when the last recession hit, it was mostly due to outsourcing and inflation.

Good time for a memory boost…

US Attorney Durham Looks at 2016 With ‘2020’ Vision

Enter Adm. Mike Rogers

According to Cole, Adm. Mike Rogers, who retired in 2018 after serving for four years as National Security Agency chief and head of U.S. Cyber Command, is cooperating voluntarily with Durham and has met multiple times with him. It was Rogers who, in October of 2016 (right after the first warrant to spy on Carter Page was signed), first advised the FISA court of abuse by the FBI. He issued a National Security Agency report accusing the FBI of improperly pulling data on Americans. He also played a key role in the intel community’s assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Rogers learned that DOJ oversight personnel had determined in March of 2016 that the FBI was giving outside “contractors” access to huge amounts of raw “Section 702”’ data on Americans, well beyond what they needed to fulfill FBI requests. Not only that, but they retained their access to such information after their work for the FBI was completed. (Just wondering: What do people working in intel have to do to lose their security clearances?) When Rogers learned this, he shut down all outside-contractor access. The FISA court has since found that the Bureau violated constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.

So there’s plenty that Durham might want to get into with Rogers. The substance of their meetings so far is unclear. But keep in mind that Attorney General William Barr has said that what started as a “review” is now a criminal investigation. Barr has also expressed his personal opinion that “spying” on members of Trump’s campaign did occur, a claim that sent CNN and MSNBC into histrionics and caused them to seek out every possible way to discredit him. But Barr was stating the obvious, something you’re not supposed to do when it helps Trump.

Barr, along with Durham, also publicly disagreed with IG Michael Horowitz’ assessment that he found no evidence of bias motivating the FBI in its investigation of the Trump campaign. Again, media histrionics. But, again, stating the obvious.

Mike Rogers is the first former intelligence director known to have been interviewed for Durham’s probe. He’s said to have been “very cooperative.” We don’t know if former CIA chief John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence Director James Clapper have been interviewed yet. But I have a feeling we’d know if they’d been asked to appear, as they’re not likely to waltz in voluntarily. This would almost certainly involve subpoenas. Both Brennan and the DOJ had no comment for the story. (Of course, the DOJ wouldn’t be commenting on an ongoing investigation), and Clapper couldn’t be reached.

But we know Durham has already been examining Brennan’s testimony before Congress as well as his communications, focusing on what Brennan said to other officials about a work of fiction called the Steele “dossier.” Recall that Brennan clearly lied in testimony about the dossier, saying it wasn’t in the “corpus” of information the intel community used to justify the investigation. That was not true. We now know it wasn’t just in the corpus — it was the corpus. They meant it to be the whole doggone corpus delicti.

moar

https://stream.org/us-attorney-durham-looks-at-2016-with-2020-vision/

>>14796640

Treason has no statute of limitations

Time for that Transparency that was promised

>>14796652

Two contradicting posts from Q.

One says NO DEALS

The other says that Deals had to be cut, otherwise sumting like 70% of congress would be in jail.

Now, if Deals are Cut, how do people learn to never let this shit habben again, when their crimes aren't seen? Due to what, Natl Embarrassment, masked as Natl Sec?

Never agreed with Deals. Deals is why this shit keeps habbening.

>>14796698

While I agree that is how is should be, this is the Post I was referring to. No jail.

15

Anonymous 10/31/2017 23:00:47

There are more good people than bad. The wizards and warlocks (inside term) will not allow another Satanic Evil POS control our country. Realize Soros, Clintons, Obama, Putin, etc. are all controlled by 3 families (the 4th was removed post Trump's victory).

11.3 - Podesta indicted

11.6 - Huma indicted

Manafort was placed into Trump's camp (as well as others). The corruption that will come out is so serious that deals must be cut for people to walk away otherwise 70% of elected politicians would be in jail (you are seeing it already begin). A deep cleaning is occurring and the prevention and defense of pure evil is occurring on a daily basis. They never thought they were going to lose control of the Presidency (not just D's) and thought they had control since making past mistakes (JFK, Reagan).

Good speed, Patriots.

PS, Soros is targeted.

>>14796723

>affirmation that knowledge of this "will" come out

Yeah, then there's that…

"The choice to know…"

Well, Anon's know. Anon's dig. So, do the "Choice" part mean, that only those that dig, will know, and the sheep will still NOT KNOW because they refuse to LOOK?

That is one of those posts that can be taken several different ways.

>>14796968

>Buckle up bittercups

The dwarfs are running