>>14796255

Vast majority of those in "assisted living facilities" are covered by insurance.

Insurance companies therefore have to pay for their care, at least a significant portion of it.

Liability. Cost.

And, each day, week, month they are in there.

Will they get better, or will their health get progressively worse over time?

The older and sicker, the more likely they will get WORSE.

….And MORE COSTLY to the insurance company.

But if they die, the insurance company's costs drop to zero. And profit goes up.

Any incentive or possible motivations here?

>>14796403

He continues to investigate as a Special Counsel.

Spies use Starbucks to communicate with handlers, ex-CIA agent reveals

No need to mark an "x" on that lamp post anymore, I guess….

https://www.indy100.com/news/spies-starbucks-cia-amaryllis-fox-b1938274

>>14796442

>>14796495

>>14796484

and then later want an abortion?

this is the state of things in "normie" world… of how stupid it all is…

MSN "news" has an article about how surgical masks (the ones you have to pay for) are "better" than cloth masks…

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/still-using-cloth-masks-it-s-time-to-switch-to-surgical-here-s-why/ar-AAPzj4p?ocid=finance-verthp-feeds

(Clown world, I know, but it is too damned indicative of the stupidity out there.)

They mention a "study" (yet to be peer reviewed, harr harr.) When you clock through to the study what do you find?

A study being done in RURAL BANGLADESH.

https://www.poverty-action.org/sites/default/files/publications/Mask_RCT____Symptomatic_Seropositivity_083121.pdf

The methodology looks so sloppy and half-assed that its supposed findings certainly have absolutely NO SCIENTIFIC VALUE AT ALL.

INSANE.