Having an emotional response to facts not in evidence is why those images are posted. Panda eyes and adrenochrome harvesting elicit emotional responses while there are no evidence of either being proven true. Not that people don't abuse children in every way. Just know why it's posted. Trauma-based mind control. And discrediting with disinformation.
No I mean the words in his prayer. I'm not Catholic, but being raised Christian I've never prayed to do the unknown will of legions, nor to a seven fold rays of anything.
How is posting an underage victim's picture any way to respect the child?
What when and where did the alleged crime happen?
How do you know this wasn't a car accident?
If you feel justified in being angry at child abusers, why does that give you the right to re-victimize the child by sharing gore porn of their injuries?
I thought Flynn was Catholic
>>14801674 pb
>>14801655 pb
No one raped the child in the picture. I don't condone child rape. I also don't condone posting pictures of rape victim's. Bombing victims shouldn't be called rape victims injuries where they cannot consent. That is sexualizing a child. It's gore child porn to post injured pictures of kids and then detail how they were assaulted.
https://www.channel4.com/news/by/jon-snow/blogs/gazas-birthplace-saints-deathyard-angels