Coulomb. Faraday

>>14801161

Miles Mathis: Coulomb's equation is a Unified Field equation in disguise

http://www.godparticle.xyz/coul.html#quantun

MM will show how Coulomb's equations can be related to Newton's. Also to show that Coulomb's constant is connected to the Bohr radius, mathematically and mechanically. MM will also show that the current constant, though highly suggestive, is incorrect

Coulomb's objects. Because they are spheres, they must emit a spherical field, and a spherical field must obey the inverse square law.

Current theory ignores this in a most flagrant manner, and they do so because they must ignore that the charge field is an emitted field. The field stops being mysterious once we realize that the density of spherical emission must fall off with the inverse square, but current theory cannot follow this reasoning. Physicists would rather cloak the field in mystery than admit that it acts precisely like a field of emission. If it is an emission field, they have to consider its mechanics. If they consider its mechanics, they have to quit talking about virtual photons or messenger photons and start talking about real photons with real energy. And if they do that, they have to ask how quanta emit quanta without dissolving. It becomes a fundamental question of conservation of energy

* * *

F = m4/s4 = v4

Notice that this last equation tells us that a force is a velocity squared squared. That is perfectly logical, although it is not something we ever find in these physics textbooks. Wikipedia, under the heading "statcoulomb", will not tell us that charge is the same as mass. Not only will it not admit that charge is dimensionally the same as mass, it goes out of its way to hide it. In this, Wiki is like all other standard textbooks, online and off. It says, "Performing dimensional analysis on Coulomb's law, the dimension of electrical charge in cgs must be [mass]1/2 [length]3/2 [time]-1". But, as MM just showed, that dimensional analysis stops short of completion, by one very important step. Wikipedia asks the question, tells you the answer, but tells you the wrong answer, on purpose

Maxwell

>>14801171

Maxwell's equations are disguised Unified Field equations

http://www.godparticle.xyz/maxwdisp.html

First published April 18, 2013

MM's previous proofs:

Newton's gravity equation is a disguised unified field equation:

"Newton's law is a Unified Field of Gravity and E/M"

Coulomb's equation is a disguised unified field equation:

"Coulomb's equation is a Unified Field equation in disguise"

The Lagrangian/Hamiltonian is a disguised unified field equation:

"Proof that the Lagrangian and the Hamiltonian are false"

Here it will be shown that Maxwell's equations are also disguised unified field equations by studying Maxwell's lesser known displacement current. The indication of this was the inclusion of ε0, which MM has shown really stands for Newton's gravity equation is a disguised unified field equation:

"G is the Key to the Secret of Gravity" . Although it has been assigned to the permittivity of free space, the number actually stands for the strength of gravity of a baryon. If gravity is in Maxwell's equations, they are unified.

* * *

At any rate, in "Gravity at the Quantum Level" , MM has found that same number for the gravity field of the proton. The constant is not the permittivity of free space, it is gravity as created by nucleons.

Of course this means that Maxwell's equation above is already unified. It contains the gravity field at that level, and is therefore another Unified Field Equation, UFE. Since Maxwell used the displacement current equation to modify Ampere's Circuital Law, we can say that Maxwell's equations are unified.

The displacement current has an associated magnetic field just as actual currents do. However it is not an electric current of moving charges, but a time-varying electric field

* * *

The unified field is not composed of gravity and E/M. E/M is only result of charge, so the unified field is properly expressed as a composition of gravity and charge . This is why MM has written his unified field equations as a unification of charge, not E/M. As we now see, the E/M field is already unified . Just consult the equation above:

E = C/g

That is already a unified field equation, and we can see the unification in the equation. The Electrical Field is Charge over Gravity. The ratio indicates the unification.