Anonymous ID: 8dfda3 May 20, 2018, 9:22 a.m. No.1481250   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1284 >>1339

>>1481009

 

Anons need to stop reading Q crumbs with the major intention of predicting the future. If there really was a meaningful way to predict from the crumbs, for instance, when a big move was coming, don't you think this would benefit (((them))) more than us? Q has better ways of verifying himself than giving us tomorrow's news today (even though he sometimes DOES do that - it's never an item of strategic significance.)

 

You're letting your impatience color your decoding.

 

The future is not telegraphed. Stop looking for it. If you do find something, it's probably disinfo to confuse (((them))) or to provoke a blunder. They figured out our comms a long time ago.

 

The worst part about the practice of trying to predict when something is going to happen, is that you are setting yourself up for disappointment.

 

So here's an idea - the number of the week is "23" - why don't we look for something other than HOURS, DAYS, DATES, and TIMES for the number "23"?