>>1481013

And if it leads to anything negative about black people, you're racist!

And if it leads to anything negative about illegal immigration, you're a xenophobe!

And if it leads to anything negative about globalists, you're also somehow an anti-semite!

And if it leads to anything negative about Islam, your an Islamophobe!

And if it leads to anything negative about inappropriately exposing children to sexual ideologies, then you're a homophobe!

And if it leads to anything related to biology, you're a transphobe!

And if it leads to…..

>>1481005

Trump himself is publicly bashing Sessions, for theater.

People who aren't in the know (i.e. most of the retards on t_d) will just blindly follow the theater and bash him also.

Anyone who DOES understand, would also bash him publicly because they would understand it's necessary theater.

This is the inevitable tack virtually anyone will take until SHTF, regardless of if they are in on Q or not.

>>1481093

So low effort.

You will only fool the stupidest of anons, which is really just doing us a service.

So shill away, I guess.

>>1481120

Just filter and move on, the shilling is so incoherent that the only thing he stands to gain is getting anons to reply and shit up the breads.

He's literally just screeching nonsense, it's very typical shilling actually. They find a one dimensional argument that they can type out (that immediately crumbles under any scrutiny) then just spam the fuck out of it all day baiting anons to reply and debunk it all day. Then they just reply to you and get you rolling around in pig shit with them.

>>1480985

Rudy was saying men in general are disposable as compared to women you retard.

Pay attention and don't post bullshit here that you don't understand.

>>1481237

All this is saying is it will test for two markers that are most common in people of Ashkenazi descent. This wouldn't prove one way or the other if someone is Jewish or not.

I have no doubt that they are capable of and do test for jewish descent.

I'm just saying the Wikipedia quote you posted doesn't say that, if you read it carefully.

>>1481319

Good find, probably some meat here, but fix your graphic.

Timestamp on your 3rd tweet is the same as the 2nd.