Anonymous ID: 45aa22 Oct. 19, 2021, 11:46 a.m. No.14815132   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5139 >>5190 >>5290 >>5446

>>14815085 (lb)

Holy Durham Batman

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/10/19/fbi-washington-oleg-deripaska-russian-oligarch-putin-ldn-vpx.cnn

 

Deripaska was running the Russian side of the OP. Ties into Ohr and Steele. If they got him, the rest will be being swept up soon. Still remains to be seen if they got him or just evidence. But evidence at this point is probably not necessary. Fingers crossed, they got Deripaska

 

Holy crap!

Anonymous ID: 45aa22 Oct. 19, 2021, 11:59 a.m. No.14815190   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5249

>>14815132

In case anons don't remember or don't know how Deripaska ties in, look at this quote from the New Yorker:

 

As I wrote in my Profile of Steele, he was working on behalf of the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-inside-story-of-christopher-steeles-trump-dossier

Anonymous ID: 45aa22 Oct. 19, 2021, 12:12 p.m. No.14815249   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5265 >>5266 >>5348

>>14815190

Also don't forget Bruce Our was buddy buddy with Deripaska too.

 

>It is a fact that, starting in 2014 and continuing at least through at least February 2017, Christopher Steele used his relationship with DOJโ€™s Organized Crime expert, Bruce Ohr, to encourage ties between Oleg Deripaska and the US government. That included brokering a meeting between Ohr and Deripaska in 2015

https://www.emptywheel.net/2021/05/23/you-cannot-discuss-disinformation-and-the-steele-dossier-without-discussing-oleg-deripaska/

Anonymous ID: 45aa22 Oct. 19, 2021, 1:20 p.m. No.14815586   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5602

>>14815533

Interesting. Found this as well.

 

>The PHSCC is a uniformed service of the U.S. government, just like the military. In fact, its members are eligible for all the same benefits as active-duty military and veterans. They are also subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

https://www.military.com/join-military/service-choices/what-us-public-health-service.html

 

They don't fall under DoD though. They're U.S. Public Health Service. This is less egregious the more I learn about it. I thought it was military.

Anonymous ID: 45aa22 Oct. 19, 2021, 1:37 p.m. No.14815687   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14815602

It's a long story that dates back all the way to the 1790s it looks like. (Just learning about it myself). But it took on the military nature for civilian doctors around this time:

 

>In 1870 a bill was passed to centralized and reorganize the Marine Hospital Service, with its headquarters in Washington DC under the position of supervising surgeon. The act also raised the hospital tax from twenty cents to forty cents until 1884. John Maynard Woodworth was the first supervising surgeon. He studied natural history and medicine in Chicago, graduating from Rush Medical College in 1862 and joining the Union Army. He quickly transformed the Marine Hospital Fund into a true system, the Marine Hospital Service. Woodworth borrowed the military model which was the only extant of appointment to public office in the 1870 and adopted it to the service. He instituted examinations for applicants and implemented required uniforms for physicians. He created a cadre of mobile, career service physicians assigned to various marine hospitals. In 1873, his title was changed to Supervising Surgeon General. His innovations were but one aspect of period of portentous development in the nascent discipline of public health.

 

There's more to it. Can be read up on here.

https://careers.publichealth.iu.edu/blog/2018/10/12/a-brief-history-of-the-public-health-service/

Anonymous ID: 45aa22 Oct. 19, 2021, 1:54 p.m. No.14815795   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5812

>>14815701

>>14815704

The media always leaves out the whole story in Supreme Court articles. They just refused to hear an emergency appeal. Meaning they told the healthcare workers to wait their turn in the line before they get to hearing the case. Of the article title does not use the words "rule in favor" or "rules against", 100 percent the thing that was refused was an expedited hearing

 

>The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear an emergency appeal aimed at stopping a vaccine requirement for Maine health care workers.

 

>Justice Stephen Breyer rejected the emergency appeal Tuesday but left the door open to try again as the clock ticks on Maineโ€™s mandate

https://www.kktv.com/2021/10/19/us-high-court-wont-stop-vaccines-maine-health-workers/