>>14816734

>>14816723 pb

>You mean like a 12 oz rib eye on the grill vs. that piss ant shot. Please. Come out from under the bed. It's safe out here.

>Graphene as graphene oxide (GO) is produced on charring the surface of meat on a barbecue forming nitrogen doped GO originating from the pyrolysis of protein in air. The unintentional intake of such nano carbon stained cooked meat is a traditional delicacy.

AS IF there is no difference between ingesting a few nanograms of graphene oxide compared to having milligrams of it injected directly into muscle tissue and absorbed directly into the bloodstream by micro-capillaries.

are you really a fucking stupid-as-shit vegan, or are you working for Pfizer? either way, GTFOH, shilltard, YOU GLOW.

>>14816843

there… fixed it for ya.

>>14816916

>Even if VAERS is reporting 10%

proly closer to 1%

>>14816952

>But, my reality isn't supporting that projection, so I don't know what the real # is.

rural anon lives where common sense prevails. i personally know only three vaxxed individuals, and one died within 2 weeks.

not a statistically significant sample, but…

>>14816976

pierced nipples are SO revolting. and it's just sad that they all act like having a nice rack is some sort of personal accomplishment.

>>14817040

>Dementia worsens over time Anon. It is a progressive illness with a variable time course for any given individual.

anon mentioning it kinda IMPLIES that the RATE of progression has increased markedly.

are you just being a contrary ass, or are you shilling for big pharma or the DS itself?

>>14817036

>I’m going to say this again, they should use Scientists as a specific term,which is really climate scientists .

hmmm… ok.

>There are millions of scientists that know nothing about climate.

then they are PISS POOR scientists.

>There are only about 3-400 climate scientists in the world, the majority if those are bought and paid for by green energy investors that want to make a killing on the technology.

horseshit. that's uninformed baseless speculation, not to mention totally false. research scientists live and die by research grants, which are approved largely by the gov't. the GOV'T chooses to fund only the proposals that fit their narrative, and discards any that challenge the narrative. some low IQ types with degrees that can't get funding for legitimate ideas because they HAVE none, turn to prostituting themselves to the gov't for a paycheck. the quality of their work speaks for itself. nowhere else in science will you find such an overwhelming majority of specious methods, paradoxical reasoning, and hare-brained conclusions.

>So it may or may not he true that 99.9% ofclimate scientists spout this bullshit

it is NOT. that in itself is a lie. the old guard that established themselves in the field before the big pseudoscience push have all pushed back, to the limit of their ability. many have lost positions and/or gone on to early retirement and writing books (that don't get published, except by the fringe press).

>>14817404

>On the Internet, nobody knows that you're a dog.

there are no bitches on the internet.

>>14817427

>>14817451

>Don’t trust the badges

and whatever you do, NEVER tell the judge the plain simple truth.