>>1481684

>>1477755

>>Jordan B. Peterson's connections to the UN, Soros, MKUltra, and more

>>1477030

>Not seeing how the Peterson research is notable. I mean, the map of connections is interesting, I suppose, but there's nothing really direct.

>More importantly, his message is the complete opposite of the cabal: individualism is preferable over collectivism, self-responsibility, there are only two genders, etc.

>Most importantly, what the hell does any of this have to do with Q?

I AGREE. When I first saw those Peterson notables on the board, I thought to myself, "They have failed to take down Q, so the social engineers figure they will use this platform to attack one of their defectors (assuming he ever was a member of the intelligentsia)."

I am not suggesting that the research on Peterson's background is not worthy of consideration or should be censored from the board, I am just suspicious of its sudden occurrence here at the same time the NY Times publishes a highly biased and disingenuous hit piece on him.

It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to recognize that Peterson is still asleep on a number of issues regarding the dangers of globalism. I understood that the first time I heard him praise Bill Gates for his "humanitarianism."

I also do not agree with everything he says and there is much to challenge with regard to many of Peterson's ideas and beliefs, but the stuff he gets right is so profoundly important to consider, I trust that he will awaken on his own when the light of truth falls upon him.

>>1444682

>The hard part for us is having to wait for the 'public' to 'know' what we've known for a very long time.

>There is no bigger threat to 'them' than the public being awake and thinking for themselves.

>Why are we here?

>Q

To paraphrase the words of Leo Tolstoy, [Q’s words above remind us] "of that unconquerable force which constitutes real genuine public opinion - that spirit of Truth while itself advancing moves all humanity.

The State knows this, and trembles before this force, and strives through its envy in every way it can to counteract or become possessed of it. They know that strength is not in force, but in the action of the mind, and in its clear expression, and, therefore, they are more afraid of the expression of independent thought than of armies; hence they institute censorships, bribe the media, and monopolize the control of religion, science, and education.

But this spiritual force which moves the world eludes them; it is neither in books nor in papers; it cannot be trapped, and is always free; it is in the depths of consciousness of each individual. The most powerful force of freedom which cannot be imprisoned is that which asserts itself in the soul of an individual when s/he is alone, in silence, and then naturally communicates his/her thoughts to a spouse, sibling, or friend; those from whom s/he would regard it as dishonest to conceal the Truth."

>>1481942

>The in-group kicked them out to maintain ideological purity.

that would certainly make sense